Re: [PATCH v4 1/3 RESEND] dt-bindings: can: fsl,flexcan: add S32G2/S32G3 SoC support

[Ciprian Marian Costea <ciprianmarian.costea@oss.nxp.com>]

On 1/13/2025 3:46 PM, Rob Herring (Arm) wrote:
> 
> On Mon, 13 Jan 2025 14:07:02 +0200, Ciprian Costea wrote:
>> From: Ciprian Marian Costea <ciprianmarian.costea@oss.nxp.com>
>>
>> Add S32G2/S32G3 SoCs compatible strings.
>>
>> A particularity for these SoCs is the presence of separate interrupts for
>> state change, bus errors, MBs 0-7 and MBs 8-127 respectively.
>>
>> Increase maxItems of 'interrupts' to 4 for S32G based SoCs and keep the
>> same restriction for other SoCs.
>>
>> Also, as part of this commit, move the 'allOf' after the required
>> properties to make the documentation easier to read.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ciprian Marian Costea <ciprianmarian.costea@oss.nxp.com>
>> ---
>>   .../bindings/net/can/fsl,flexcan.yaml         | 44 +++++++++++++++++--
>>   1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
> 
> 
> Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags when posting new versions. However,
> there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream
> maintainer will do that for acks received on the version they apply.
> 
> If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
> 
> Missing tags:
> 
> Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
> 
> 
> 

Hello Rob,

I just wanted to add the RESEND word to these patch series because no 
update was made with respect to its acceptance. Following [1] kernel 
documentation for submitting patches I was not sure if by adding the 
received 'Acked-by' to a commit it will still be correct to add the 
RESEND word or I should send a new patch version on this series.

On short, my lack of addition for the 'Acked-by' was not on purpose.

[1] https://docs.kernel.org/process/submitting-patches.html

Best Regards,
Ciprian