From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755160AbYJOXyF (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Oct 2008 19:54:05 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753797AbYJOXxy (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Oct 2008 19:53:54 -0400 Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.174]:21031 "EHLO ug-out-1314.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753788AbYJOXxx (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Oct 2008 19:53:53 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references:x-google-sender-auth; b=Brod604WjywMdQywRCP9x5jwXL93T6Dw12qh1E2HrPzm6HtHwMnTAYcitJRZh13h0z zH6DqnzFATcQ4EIuZhC1HocG0xc81Go+WqflLWCapIhRIRuuWBcpunxL435Afr3NNu79 QO66sZ2HLXchUlaLvCMU6igrdrkv/t//PY5oo= Message-ID: <12c511ca0810151653p535d5ae4j297cf5b41900a4ba@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 16:53:51 -0700 From: "Tony Luck" To: "Andrew Morton" Subject: Re: is the weeks before -rc1 the time to really be working on -next? Cc: "David Miller" , alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, greg@kroah.com, sfr@canb.auug.org.au, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20081015164139.ebcd24c6.akpm@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20081015145606.2af3baf1.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20081015233607.54c1d6b8@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <20081015155353.f15a996e.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20081015.160821.143702739.davem@davemloft.net> <20081015164139.ebcd24c6.akpm@linux-foundation.org> X-Google-Sender-Auth: efc006d1a8a07a07 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Yes, but then people would end up being based on linux-next, and that's > a pretty rubbery target with all the rebasing and trees getting > dropped, etc. And they'd accidentally end up having to actually > compile and run linux-next, shock-horror-oh-the-humanity. I built and booted linux-next a couple of times a week or so for ia64. Most of the time it worked just fine. I found a few build problems, but only three run-time problems. My boot log shows 49 successful boots of linux-next based kernels from 2.6.25-rc2 to 2.6.27-rc6 But perhaps less people are working on breaking ia64 :-) -Tony