From: "David Hildenbrand (Arm)" <david@kernel.org>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Stefan Teodorescu <fane@google.com>,
Dennis Tighe <dtighe@google.com>,
Sashiko Bot <sashiko-bot@kernel.org>,
Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@google.com>,
Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/6] KVM: guest_memfd: Split bind() into prepare()+commit() phases
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2026 14:01:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <12d52890-7c39-445a-993e-d4b86f816cf8@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260922001332.1121266-5-seanjc@google.com>
On 9/22/26 02:13, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> Split binding a memslot to a guest_memfd instance into prepare() and
> commit() phases so that KVM can separate preparing the memslot from binding
> the memslot to the gmem instance, i.e. from committing the memslot. This
> will allow waiting to commit the memslot+gmem binding until the memslot is
> fully prepared, which is necessary as the memslot becomes reachable when
> the binding is created.
>
> As a bonus, drop the unwind-on-failure from the commit phase (other than
> nullifying the bindings), as the only reason bind() did the full unwind is
> because it technically didn't own the memslot, i.e. "needed" to leave
> memslot in the same state it started in.
>
> No functional change intended (the unwinding down on bind() failure was
> effectively dead code since KVM simply deletes the memslot on failure,
> i.e. there was nothing that could actually observe the unwind).
>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
> ---
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand (Arm) <david@kernel.org>
--
Cheers,
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-22 12:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-22 0:13 [PATCH v5 0/6] KVM: guest_memfd: Fix binding bugs Sean Christopherson
2026-09-22 0:13 ` [PATCH v5 1/6] KVM: guest_memfd: Gracefully handle xarray errors when binding a memslot Sean Christopherson
2026-09-22 0:13 ` [PATCH v5 2/6] KVM: Use goto to handle errors during memslot preparation Sean Christopherson
2026-09-22 0:13 ` [PATCH v5 3/6] KVM: Only bind memslot to guest_memfd instance for CREATE operations Sean Christopherson
2026-09-22 8:15 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-09-22 0:13 ` [PATCH v5 4/6] KVM: guest_memfd: Split bind() into prepare()+commit() phases Sean Christopherson
2026-09-22 12:01 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm) [this message]
2026-09-22 0:13 ` [PATCH v5 5/6] KVM: guest_memfd: Establish memslot<=>guest_memfd bindings *after* memslot is ready Sean Christopherson
2026-09-22 0:13 ` [PATCH v5 6/6] KVM: guest_memfd: Drop superfluous WRITE_ONCE() when binding a memslot Sean Christopherson
2026-09-22 11:53 ` Yan Zhao
2026-09-22 13:47 ` Sean Christopherson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=12d52890-7c39-445a-993e-d4b86f816cf8@kernel.org \
--to=david@kernel.org \
--cc=ackerleytng@google.com \
--cc=dtighe@google.com \
--cc=fane@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=yan.y.zhao@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®