From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1754018Ab1CQObs (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Thu, 17 Mar 2011 10:31:48 -0400
Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([71.74.56.123]:42382 "EHLO
	hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1752703Ab1CQObo (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 17 Mar 2011 10:31:44 -0400
X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=pN6kzQkhXdmdOr6Akjoh3kGBD/S3UyPMKQp53EJY+ro= c=1 sm=0 a=MpKEIbNVzpcA:10 a=Q9fys5e9bTEA:10 a=OPBmh+XkhLl+Enan7BmTLg==:17 a=wmr2nzbt3bSdcDwIfjoA:9 a=t6nt9AjDfIoEArxn6uMMG0fBxu4A:4 a=PUjeQqilurYA:10 a=OPBmh+XkhLl+Enan7BmTLg==:117
X-Cloudmark-Score: 0
X-Originating-IP: 67.242.120.143
Subject: Re: um: WARNING: at kernel/futex.c:786 __unqueue_futex
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: richard -rw- weinberger <richard.weinberger@gmail.com>
Cc: laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, dvhart@linux.intel.com
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=Z_yYkdwzO7TMs7nSMOXR9wn_7BxtKjOKgS5HL@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTi=e+tM-WTerLmkZfLTQqKCLsJHVBgQ5sj+TMjc4@mail.gmail.com>
	 <1300370936.16880.96.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
	 <AANLkTi=Z_yYkdwzO7TMs7nSMOXR9wn_7BxtKjOKgS5HL@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15"
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 10:31:42 -0400
Message-ID: <1300372302.16880.121.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 15:27 +0100, richard -rw- weinberger wrote:

> BTW: When using WARN_ON_SMP() the if-statement in __unqueue_futex
> will not longer work.
> 
> WARN_ON_SMP() is defined as "do { } while (0)" on non CONFIG_SMP systems.

Good point. We probably should fix that too.

-- Steve