From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756514Ab1CRJM6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Mar 2011 05:12:58 -0400 Received: from casper.infradead.org ([85.118.1.10]:44019 "EHLO casper.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756311Ab1CRJMv convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Mar 2011 05:12:51 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2] WARN_ON_SMP(): Allow use in if statements on UP From: Peter Zijlstra To: Steven Rostedt Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , Andrew Morton , Thomas Gleixner , Lai Jiangshan , Darren Hart In-Reply-To: <20110317215829.363324265@goodmis.org> References: <20110317215612.566569234@goodmis.org> <20110317215829.363324265@goodmis.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 10:12:18 +0100 Message-ID: <1300439538.21794.18.camel@twins> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 17:56 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > + * WARN_ON(!spin_is_locked(&lock)) checks, as spin_is_locked() > + * returns 0 for uniprocessor settings. Arguably most spin_is_locked() usages should be removed in favour of something like lockdep_assert_held(). The latter only emits code then built with lockdep enabled and it checks we are indeed the owner, not some random other cpu.