mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
	fweisbec@gmail.com, mingo@redhat.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] tracing - avoid soft lockup in trace_pipe
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 22:23:18 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1301019798.14261.159.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110321121008.GA1979@jolsa.brq.redhat.com>

On Mon, 2011-03-21 at 13:10 +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 07:06:21PM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 11:20:57AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2011-03-14 at 16:07 +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > > > So we get back the the while loop with no data added and with
> > > > TRACE_TYPE_HANDLED return code, which will keep us in the loop.
> > > > 
> > > > Not sure this is bug or feature :)
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > Most bugs are features ;)
> > > 
> > > honestly, I'd love to rip out all the "bin", "hex" etc formats as they
> > > are pretty much deprecated.
> > > 
> > > But as you pointed out that this can keep us in the inner loop, we need
> > > to fix that. I prefer to fix it within the nop print function. Perhaps
> > > we need to fill in something. "type: %d", iter->ent->type ?
> > 
> > sounds ok :) attaching v2 patch
> hi, any feedback?

Ah, sorry, as this was a reply to the original thread, it didn't pop up
immediately.

> > 
> > 
> > ---
> > running following commands:
> > 
> >   # enable the binary option
> >   echo 1 > ./options/bin
> >   # disable context info option
> >   echo 0 > ./options/context-info 
> >   # tracing only events
> >   echo 1 > ./events/enable
> >   cat trace_pipe
> > 
> > is causing lockup (in NON preemptive kernels) inside
> > tracing_read_pipe function.
> > 
> > The reason are:
> >  - bin/hex/raw output functions for events are set to
> >    trace_nop_print function, which prints nothing and
> >    returns TRACE_TYPE_HANDLED value
> >  - LOST EVENT trace do not handle trace_seq overflow
> > 
> > These reasons force the while loop in tracing_read_pipe
> > function never to break.
> > 
> > The attached patch fixies handling of lost event trace, and
> > changes trace_nop_print to print minimal info, which is needed
> > for the correct tracing_read_pipe processing.
> > 
> > v2 changes:
> >  - omit the cond_resched changes by trace_nop_print changes
> >  - WARN changed to WARN_ONCE and added info to be able
> >    to find out the culprit

So this replaces both patches, correct?

Thanks,

-- Steve




  reply	other threads:[~2011-03-25  2:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-03-12 22:59 [PATCH 0/2] " Jiri Olsa
2011-03-12 22:59 ` [PATCH 1/2] tracing - trace lost events properly Jiri Olsa
2011-03-12 22:59 ` [PATCH 2/2] tracing - putting cond_resched into tace_pipe loop Jiri Olsa
2011-03-13 14:58   ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-03-14 14:07     ` Steven Rostedt
2011-03-14 14:18       ` Jiri Olsa
2011-03-14 14:28         ` Steven Rostedt
2011-03-14 15:07           ` Jiri Olsa
2011-03-14 15:20             ` Steven Rostedt
2011-03-14 18:06               ` [PATCHv2] tracing - avoid soft lockup in trace_pipe Jiri Olsa
2011-03-21 12:10                 ` Jiri Olsa
2011-03-25  2:23                   ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2011-03-25  3:14                     ` Steven Rostedt
2011-03-25 11:05                       ` [PATCHv3] " Jiri Olsa
2011-03-25 15:46                         ` Steven Rostedt
2011-03-25 15:49                         ` Steven Rostedt
2011-03-25 15:53                           ` Jiri Olsa
2011-04-27 15:22                         ` [tip:perf/core] tracing: Avoid " tip-bot for Jiri Olsa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1301019798.14261.159.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com \
    --to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®