From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754127Ab1C2TJy (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Mar 2011 15:09:54 -0400 Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([71.74.56.124]:58892 "EHLO hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751835Ab1C2TJx (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Mar 2011 15:09:53 -0400 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=qyUSAyc82z9xLljZQc9ErY9Tl2GSEfqK/XYZS35I9d8= c=1 sm=0 a=QQXixWDqseIA:10 a=Q9fys5e9bTEA:10 a=OPBmh+XkhLl+Enan7BmTLg==:17 a=meVymXHHAAAA:8 a=yf7tFXOqs6SvTWheinQA:9 a=YAE0QbMEHybjuxntPRrWHfnHCoEA:4 a=PUjeQqilurYA:10 a=jeBq3FmKZ4MA:10 a=OPBmh+XkhLl+Enan7BmTLg==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Originating-IP: 67.242.120.143 Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] lockdep: Print a nice description of an irq locking issue From: Steven Rostedt To: Ingo Molnar Cc: LKML , Thomas Gleixner , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , Peter Zijlstra In-Reply-To: <20110329182154.GA18913@elte.hu> References: <1301418845.14261.284.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> <20110329182131.GB16244@elte.hu> <20110329182154.GA18913@elte.hu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15" Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 15:09:50 -0400 Message-ID: <1301425790.14261.290.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2011-03-29 at 20:21 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > * Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > > > After having to explain lockdep interrupt locking inversions a few > > > times, I decided to have lockdep spit out the scenario that it is > > > complaining about. > > > > Looks very useful! > > > > Would you be interested in extending this to other lockdep splats as well? Sure, that should not be a problem. > > In separate patches, of course. Of course ;) -- Steve