From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@linux.intel.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jason Baron <jbaron@redhat.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@elte.hu,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@linux.intel.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] x86, cpu: Change NOP selection for certain Intel CPUs
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 15:36:00 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1303166160-10315-4-git-send-email-hpa@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1303166160-10315-1-git-send-email-hpa@linux.intel.com>
Due to a decoder implementation quirk, some specific Intel CPUs
actually perform better with the "k8_nops" than with the
SDM-recommended NOPs. For runtime-selected NOPs, if we detect those
specific CPUs then use the k8_nops instead of the ones we would
normally use.
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Jason Baron <jbaron@redhat.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c | 9 ++++++++-
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c b/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
index 2ca3f65..34bf87e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
@@ -190,7 +190,14 @@ void __init arch_init_ideal_nops(void)
{
switch (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor) {
case X86_VENDOR_INTEL:
- if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_NOPL)) {
+ if (boot_cpu_data.x86 == 6 &&
+ boot_cpu_data.x86_model >= 0x0f &&
+ boot_cpu_data.x86_model != 0x1c &&
+ boot_cpu_data.x86_model != 0x26 &&
+ boot_cpu_data.x86_model != 0x27 &&
+ boot_cpu_data.x86_model < 0x30) {
+ ideal_nops = k8_nops;
+ } else if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_NOPL)) {
ideal_nops = p6_nops;
} else {
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
--
1.7.3.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-18 22:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-18 22:35 [RFC PATCHSET] x86, cpu: Clean up and unify the NOP selection infrastructure H. Peter Anvin
2011-04-18 22:35 ` [PATCH 1/3] x86, percpu: Use ASM_NOP4 instead of hardcoding P6_NOP4 H. Peter Anvin
2011-04-19 1:01 ` [tip:x86/cpu] " tip-bot for H. Peter Anvin
2011-04-18 22:35 ` [PATCH 2/3] x86, cpu: Clean up and unify the NOP selection infrastructure H. Peter Anvin
2011-04-18 23:31 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-04-18 23:39 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-04-18 23:58 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-04-19 1:01 ` [tip:x86/cpu] " tip-bot for H. Peter Anvin
2011-04-18 22:36 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2011-04-18 23:34 ` [PATCH 3/3] x86, cpu: Change NOP selection for certain Intel CPUs Steven Rostedt
2011-04-19 1:02 ` [tip:x86/cpu] " tip-bot for H. Peter Anvin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1303166160-10315-4-git-send-email-hpa@linux.intel.com \
--to=hpa@linux.intel.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=jbaron@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome