From: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
To: "tim.gardner@canonical.com" <tim.gardner@canonical.com>
Cc: "tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"hpa@zytor.com" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.39-rc5] ioremap: Delay sanity check until after a successful mapping
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 12:49:09 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1304020149.2697.5.camel@sbsiddha-MOBL3.sc.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4DB99D2E.9080106@canonical.com>
On Thu, 2011-04-28 at 10:00 -0700, Tim Gardner wrote:
> While tracking down the reason for an ioremap() failure I was
> distracted
> by the WARN_ONCE() in __ioremap_caller(). Can we move the sanity
> check
> later in the function until _after_ the mapping has been performed?
>
> rtg
> --
> Tim Gardner tim.gardner@canonical.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> differences
> between files
> attachment
> (0001-ioremap-Delay-sanity-check-until-after-a-successful-.patch)
>
> From 31dec327a254888fcd0b6aa963414b09626d3168 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Tim Gardner <tim.gardner@canonical.com>
> Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 10:07:51 -0600
> Subject: [PATCH] ioremap: Delay sanity check until after a successful
> mapping
>
> Performing a WARN_ONCE() sanity check before the mapping
> is successful seems pointless if the caller sends bad values.
> A case in point is when the BIOS provides erroneous screen_info values
> causing vesafb_probe() to request an outrageuous size. The
> WARN_ONCE is then wasted on bogosity. Move the warning to a
> point where the mapping has been successfully allocated.
>
> http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/772042
Sounds good to me.
Reviewed-by: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-28 19:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-28 17:00 Tim Gardner
2011-04-28 19:49 ` Suresh Siddha [this message]
2011-04-29 6:31 ` [tip:x86/mm] " tip-bot for Tim Gardner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1304020149.2697.5.camel@sbsiddha-MOBL3.sc.intel.com \
--to=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tim.gardner@canonical.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®