From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753967Ab1EEWVu (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 May 2011 18:21:50 -0400 Received: from mail.perches.com ([173.55.12.10]:1279 "EHLO mail.perches.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751564Ab1EEWVt (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 May 2011 18:21:49 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] wireless: Make and use const struct ieee80211_channel From: Joe Perches To: "John W. Linville" Cc: libertas-dev@lists.infradead.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, orinoco-users@lists.sourceforge.net, orinoco-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, LKML In-Reply-To: <20110505184934.GB3005@tuxdriver.com> References: <20110505184934.GB3005@tuxdriver.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Thu, 05 May 2011 15:21:47 -0700 Message-ID: <1304634107.1788.171.camel@Joe-Laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2011-05-05 at 14:49 -0400, John W. Linville wrote: > These patches generated a lot of warnings in net/mac80211. Did you > actually build them? Yes. Did you apply patch 1/2 first? It's a dependent patch.