From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751239Ab1EHFJ2 (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 May 2011 01:09:28 -0400 Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.23]:38544 "HELO mailout-de.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1750878Ab1EHFJ0 (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 May 2011 01:09:26 -0400 X-Authenticated: #14349625 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+fYO4xfuGf+B4sV68aHCOyIg4UQqdBJSbDpRFVv5 qFuCcR+XPa3GP+ Subject: Re: -longterm kernels From: Mike Galbraith To: Stanislaw Gruszka Cc: Greg KH , stable@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20110507145503.GA2276@redhat.com> References: <201105030110.p431A5W0005426@hera.kernel.org> <20110504223605.GA5967@kroah.com> <20110505145854.GA4670@redhat.com> <20110505152501.GA14146@kroah.com> <20110507145503.GA2276@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Sun, 08 May 2011 07:09:21 +0200 Message-ID: <1304831361.6326.21.camel@marge.simson.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 2011-05-07 at 16:55 +0200, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote: > On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 08:25:01AM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > > > BTW, Greg, perhaps -logterm releasing policy should be revised somehow. > > > Currently we have .32, .33, .34, .35 -longterm, what is kind a much. > > > > It's not "much" if you rely on that kernel version, right? > > Yes, but maybe would be better if they do not relay on some versions in > long term manner, and i.e. .33 users would use .32 and .34 users would > use .35 instead? Ceasing to rely upon .33 isn't a trivial choice for -rt tree users. -Mike