From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754515Ab1ELLYU (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 May 2011 07:24:20 -0400 Received: from casper.infradead.org ([85.118.1.10]:36974 "EHLO casper.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751596Ab1ELLYT (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 May 2011 07:24:19 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: rt_rq runtime leakage bug fix From: Peter Zijlstra To: Cheng Xu Cc: Ingo Molnar , Paul Mckenney , LKML In-Reply-To: <4DCBBC9D.7020908@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <4DCA3C0C.3080901@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1305105711.2914.205.camel@laptop> <4DCAC79A.7050505@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1305195150.2914.268.camel@laptop> <4DCBBC9D.7020908@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 13:27:22 +0200 Message-ID: <1305199642.2914.270.camel@laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2011-05-12 at 18:55 +0800, Cheng Xu wrote: > #define for_each_rt_rq(rt_rq, iter, rq) \ > for ((void) iter, rt_rq = &rq->rt; rt_rq; rt_rq = NULL) > > maybe we can still use it? Sure that looks fine to me, looking fwd to your final patch!