From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933092Ab1EMNze (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 May 2011 09:55:34 -0400 Received: from newsmtp5.atmel.com ([204.2.163.5]:53911 "EHLO sjogate2.atmel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932120Ab1EMNzc (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 May 2011 09:55:32 -0400 From: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD To: gregkh@suse.de, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, sshtylyov@mvista.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, plagnioj@jcrosoft.com Subject: [PATCH V2] usb/gadget: at91sam9g20 fix end point max packet size Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 17:03:02 +0200 Message-Id: <1305298982-5789-1-git-send-email-plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.7.3 In-Reply-To: <1305042888-19401-1-git-send-email-plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> References: <1305042888-19401-1-git-send-email-plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org on 9g20 they are the same as the 9260 Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre --- Resent upon Greg's request. Based on current linux-next. Applies cleanly on current linus' tree (2.6.39-rc7+) BTW, can we imagine it going to mainline before .39-final in a "fixes" pull request to Linus from a at91 tree? drivers/usb/gadget/at91_udc.c | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/at91_udc.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/at91_udc.c index 9b7cdb1..41dc093 100644 --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/at91_udc.c +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/at91_udc.c @@ -1767,7 +1767,7 @@ static int __init at91udc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) } /* newer chips have more FIFO memory than rm9200 */ - if (cpu_is_at91sam9260()) { + if (cpu_is_at91sam9260() || cpu_is_at91sam9g20()) { udc->ep[0].maxpacket = 64; udc->ep[3].maxpacket = 64; udc->ep[4].maxpacket = 512; -- 1.7.3