From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754453Ab1EPKNI (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 May 2011 06:13:08 -0400 Received: from casper.infradead.org ([85.118.1.10]:50447 "EHLO casper.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754197Ab1EPKNG convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 May 2011 06:13:06 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: statistics about nested locks From: Peter Zijlstra To: Juri Lelli Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Yong Zhang , Ingo Molnar In-Reply-To: <4DD0F614.2040408@gmail.com> References: <4DD0F614.2040408@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 12:12:56 +0200 Message-ID: <1305540776.2466.4094.camel@twins> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2011-05-16 at 12:01 +0200, Juri Lelli wrote: > +The graph below shows the relation between the lock functions and the > various > +hooks therein. That smells like the patch has whitespace damage..