From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
To: Jens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>
Cc: "paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>,
linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Mysterious CFQ crash and RCU
Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 11:13:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1306314848.9059.17.camel@t41.thuisdomein> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4DDCC1E4.706@fusionio.com>
On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 10:46 +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> Are you easily able to test a patch out?
Yes.
> Having a
> test case on your machine that is as easily reproducible as it seems to
> be, would be a great place to test ideas out.
Maybe I should now also try to build CFQ (and the other schedulers, I
guess) as a module (instead of Fedora's default of builtin). That might
make it both easier and quicker to iterate over a number of ideas.
Does using the schedulers as modules require any handholding (on your
part, I'm afraid) or is it not really different from using any other
kernel module?
Paul Bolle
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-25 9:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-19 22:24 Vivek Goyal
2011-05-21 21:00 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-21 22:23 ` Paul Bolle
2011-05-21 23:54 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-22 19:30 ` Paul Bolle
2011-05-22 20:13 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-23 15:21 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-05-23 15:38 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-23 22:20 ` Paul Bolle
2011-05-24 4:14 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-24 9:41 ` Jens Axboe
2011-05-24 14:35 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-24 14:51 ` Jens Axboe
2011-05-24 15:42 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-24 15:51 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-25 8:28 ` Paul Bolle
2011-05-25 8:46 ` Jens Axboe
2011-05-25 9:13 ` Paul Bolle [this message]
2011-05-25 9:30 ` Jens Axboe
2011-05-25 9:40 ` Paul Bolle
2011-05-25 12:48 ` Paul Bolle
2011-05-25 12:51 ` Jens Axboe
2011-05-25 17:28 ` Paul Bolle
2011-05-25 18:59 ` Jens Axboe
2011-05-25 10:17 ` Paul Bolle
2011-05-25 15:33 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-25 17:44 ` Paul Bolle
2011-05-25 20:40 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-26 9:15 ` Paul Bolle
2011-06-03 5:07 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-06-03 13:45 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-06-03 15:33 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-06-03 16:54 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-06-04 12:22 ` Paul Bolle
2011-06-04 12:50 ` Paul Bolle
2011-06-04 16:03 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-06-04 22:48 ` Paul Bolle
2011-06-04 23:06 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-08-04 15:05 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-08-04 19:43 ` Jens Axboe
2011-08-04 19:51 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-06-05 6:56 ` Jens Axboe
2011-06-05 8:39 ` Paul Bolle
2011-06-05 10:38 ` Paul Bolle
2011-06-05 22:51 ` Jens Axboe
2011-06-06 14:28 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-05-23 15:36 ` Vivek Goyal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1306314848.9059.17.camel@t41.thuisdomein \
--to=pebolle@tiscali.nl \
--cc=jaxboe@fusionio.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®