From: Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kees.cook@canonical.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@elte.hu, rostedt@goodmis.org,
jmorris@namei.org, Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 05/13] seccomp_filter: Document what seccomp_filter is and how it works.
Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 22:10:37 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1306897845-9393-5-git-send-email-wad@chromium.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTimNcag-ZmVTXjUoTyiuJm6jtW0DgA@mail.gmail.com>
Adds a text file covering what CONFIG_SECCOMP_FILTER is, how it is
implemented presently, and what it may be used for. In addition,
the limitations and caveats of the proposed implementation are
included.
v3: a little more cleanup
v2: moved to prctl/
updated for the v2 syntax.
adds a note about compat behavior
Signed-off-by: Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org>
---
Documentation/prctl/seccomp_filter.txt | 145 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 files changed, 145 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 Documentation/prctl/seccomp_filter.txt
diff --git a/Documentation/prctl/seccomp_filter.txt b/Documentation/prctl/seccomp_filter.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..27ac5af
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/prctl/seccomp_filter.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,145 @@
+ Seccomp filtering
+ =================
+
+Introduction
+------------
+
+A large number of system calls are exposed to every userland process
+with many of them going unused for the entire lifetime of the process.
+As system calls change and mature, bugs are found and eradicated. A
+certain subset of userland applications benefit by having a reduce set
+of available system calls. The reduced set reduces the total kernel
+surface exposed to the application. System call filtering is meant for
+use with those applications.
+
+The implementation currently leverages both the existing seccomp
+infrastructure and the kernel tracing infrastructure. By centralizing
+hooks for attack surface reduction in seccomp, it is possible to assure
+attention to security that is less relevant in normal ftrace scenarios,
+such as time-of-check, time-of-use attacks. However, ftrace provides a
+rich, human-friendly environment for interfacing with system call
+specific arguments. (As such, this requires FTRACE_SYSCALLS for any
+introspective filtering support.)
+
+
+What it isn't
+-------------
+
+System call filtering isn't a sandbox. It provides a clearly defined
+mechanism for minimizing the exposed kernel surface. Beyond that,
+policy for logical behavior and information flow should be managed with
+a combinations of other system hardening techniques and, potentially, a
+LSM of your choosing. Expressive, dynamic filters based on the ftrace
+filter engine provide further options down this path (avoiding
+pathological sizes or selecting which of the multiplexed system calls in
+socketcall() is allowed, for instance) which could be construed,
+incorrectly, as a more complete sandboxing solution.
+
+
+Usage
+-----
+
+An additional seccomp mode is exposed through mode '2'.
+This mode depends on CONFIG_SECCOMP_FILTER. By default, it provides
+only the most trivial of filter support "1" or cleared. However, if
+CONFIG_FTRACE_SYSCALLS is enabled, the ftrace filter engine may be used
+for more expressive filters.
+
+A collection of filters may be supplied via prctl, and the current set
+of filters is exposed in /proc/<pid>/seccomp_filter.
+
+Interacting with seccomp filters can be done through three new prctl calls
+and one existing one.
+
+PR_SET_SECCOMP:
+ A pre-existing option for enabling strict seccomp mode (1) or
+ filtering seccomp (2).
+
+ Usage:
+ prctl(PR_SET_SECCOMP, 1); /* strict */
+ prctl(PR_SET_SECCOMP, 2); /* filters */
+
+PR_SET_SECCOMP_FILTER:
+ Allows the specification of a new filter for a given system
+ call, by number, and filter string. If CONFIG_FTRACE_SYSCALLS is
+ supported, the filter string may be any valid value for the
+ given system call. If it is not supported, the filter string
+ may only be "1".
+
+ All calls to PR_SET_SECCOMP_FILTER for a given system
+ call will append the supplied string to any existing filters.
+ Filter construction looks as follows:
+ (Nothing) + "fd == 1 || fd == 2" => fd == 1 || fd == 2
+ ... + "fd != 2" => (fd == 1 || fd == 2) && fd != 2
+ ... + "size < 100" =>
+ ((fd == 1 || fd == 2) && fd != 2) && size < 100
+ If there is no filter and the seccomp mode has already
+ transitioned to filtering, additions cannot be made. Filters
+ may only be added that reduce the available kernel surface.
+
+ Usage (per the construction example above):
+ prctl(PR_SET_SECCOMP_FILTER, __NR_write, "fd == 1 || fd == 2");
+ prctl(PR_SET_SECCOMP_FILTER, __NR_write, "fd != 2");
+ prctl(PR_SET_SECCOMP_FILTER, __NR_write, "size < 100");
+
+PR_CLEAR_SECCOMP_FILTER:
+ Removes all filter entries for a given system call number. When
+ called prior to entering seccomp filtering mode, it allows for
+ new filters to be applied to the same system call. After
+ transition, however, it completely drops access to the call.
+
+ Usage:
+ prctl(PR_CLEAR_SECCOMP_FILTER, __NR_open);
+
+PR_GET_SECCOMP_FILTER: Returns the aggregated filter string for a system
+ call into a user-supplied buffer of a given length.
+
+ Usage:
+ prctl(PR_GET_SECCOMP_FILTER, __NR_write, buf,
+ sizeof(buf));
+
+All of the above calls return 0 on success and non-zero on error.
+
+
+Example
+-------
+
+Assume a process would like to cleanly read and write to stdin/out/err
+as well as access its filters after seccomp enforcement begins. This
+may be done as follows:
+
+ prctl(PR_SET_SECCOMP_FILTER, __NR_read, "fd == 0");
+ prctl(PR_SET_SECCOMP_FILTER, __NR_write, "fd == 1 || fd == 2");
+ prctl(PR_SET_SECCOMP_FILTER, __NR_exit, "1");
+ prctl(PR_SET_SECCOMP_FILTER, __NR_prctl, "1");
+
+ prctl(PR_SET_SECCOMP, PR_SECCOMP_MODE_FILTER, 0);
+
+ /* Do stuff with fdset . . .*/
+
+ /* Drop read access and keep only write access to fd 1. */
+ prctl(PR_CLEAR_SECCOMP_FILTER, __NR_read);
+ prctl(PR_SET_SECCOMP_FILTER, __NR_write, "fd != 2");
+
+ /* Perform any final processing . . . */
+ syscall(__NR_exit, 0);
+
+
+Caveats
+-------
+
+- The filter event subsystem comes from CONFIG_TRACE_EVENTS, and the
+system call events come from CONFIG_FTRACE_SYSCALLS. However, if
+neither are available, a filter string of "1" will be honored, and it may
+be removed using PR_CLEAR_SECCOMP_FILTER. With ftrace filtering,
+calling PR_SET_SECCOMP_FILTER with a filter of "0" would have similar
+affect but would not be consistent on a kernel without the support.
+
+- Some platforms support a 32-bit userspace with 64-bit kernels. In
+these cases (CONFIG_COMPAT), system call numbers may not match across
+64-bit and 32-bit system calls. When the first PRCTL_SET_SECCOMP_FILTER
+is called, the in-memory filters state is annotated with whether the
+call has been made via the compat interface. All subsequent calls will
+be checked for compat call mismatch. In the long run, it may make sense
+to store compat and non-compat filters separately, but that is not
+supported at present.
--
1.7.0.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-01 3:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 91+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1305563026.5456.19.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
[not found] ` <20110516165249.GB10929@elte.hu>
[not found] ` <1305565422.5456.21.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
[not found] ` <20110517124212.GB21441@elte.hu>
[not found] ` <1305637528.5456.723.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
[not found] ` <20110517131902.GF21441@elte.hu>
[not found] ` <BANLkTikBK3-KZ10eErQ6Eex_L6Qe2aZang@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <1305807728.11267.25.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
[not found] ` <BANLkTiki8aQJbFkKOFC+s6xAEiuVyMM5MQ@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <BANLkTim9UyYAGhg06vCFLxkYPX18cPymEQ@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <20110524200815.GD27634@elte.hu>
2011-05-24 20:25 ` [PATCH 3/5] v2 seccomp_filters: Enable ftrace-based system call filtering Kees Cook
2011-05-25 19:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-25 16:40 ` Will Drewry
[not found] ` <1306254027.18455.47.camel@twins>
[not found] ` <20110524195435.GC27634@elte.hu>
[not found] ` <alpine.LFD.2.02.1105242239230.3078@ionos>
[not found] ` <20110525150153.GE29179@elte.hu>
[not found] ` <alpine.LFD.2.02.1105251836030.3078@ionos>
2011-05-25 18:01 ` Kees Cook
2011-05-25 18:42 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-05-25 19:06 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-25 19:54 ` Will Drewry
2011-05-25 19:11 ` Kees Cook
2011-05-25 20:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-05-25 20:19 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-06-09 9:00 ` Sven Anders
2011-05-26 14:37 ` Colin Walters
2011-05-26 15:03 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-05-26 15:28 ` Colin Walters
2011-05-26 16:33 ` Will Drewry
2011-05-26 16:46 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-05-26 17:02 ` Will Drewry
2011-05-26 17:04 ` Will Drewry
2011-05-26 17:17 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-05-26 17:38 ` Will Drewry
2011-05-26 18:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-05-26 18:47 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-26 19:05 ` david
2011-05-26 19:09 ` Eric Paris
2011-05-26 19:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-26 19:49 ` david
2011-05-26 18:49 ` Will Drewry
2011-06-01 3:10 ` [PATCH v3 01/13] tracing: split out filter initialization and clean up Will Drewry
2011-06-01 3:10 ` [PATCH v3 02/13] tracing: split out syscall_trace_enter construction Will Drewry
2011-06-01 7:00 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-06-01 17:15 ` Will Drewry
2011-06-02 14:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-06-02 15:18 ` Will Drewry
2011-06-01 3:10 ` [PATCH v3 03/13] seccomp_filters: new mode with configurable syscall filters Will Drewry
2011-06-02 17:36 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-06-02 18:14 ` Will Drewry
2011-06-02 19:42 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-06-02 20:28 ` Will Drewry
2011-06-02 20:46 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-06-02 21:12 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-06-01 3:10 ` [PATCH v3 04/13] seccomp_filter: add process state reporting Will Drewry
2011-06-01 3:10 ` Will Drewry [this message]
2011-06-01 21:23 ` [PATCH v3 05/13] seccomp_filter: Document what seccomp_filter is and how it works Kees Cook
2011-06-01 23:03 ` Will Drewry
2011-06-01 3:10 ` [PATCH v3 06/13] x86: add HAVE_SECCOMP_FILTER and seccomp_execve Will Drewry
2011-06-01 3:10 ` [PATCH v3 07/13] arm: select HAVE_SECCOMP_FILTER Will Drewry
2011-06-01 3:10 ` [PATCH v3 08/13] microblaze: select HAVE_SECCOMP_FILTER and provide seccomp_execve Will Drewry
2011-06-01 5:37 ` Michal Simek
2011-06-01 3:10 ` [PATCH v3 09/13] mips: " Will Drewry
2011-06-01 3:10 ` [PATCH v3 10/13] s390: " Will Drewry
2011-06-01 3:10 ` [PATCH v3 11/13] powerpc: " Will Drewry
2011-06-01 3:10 ` [PATCH v3 12/13] sparc: " Will Drewry
2011-06-01 3:35 ` David Miller
2011-06-01 3:10 ` [PATCH v3 13/13] sh: select HAVE_SECCOMP_FILTER Will Drewry
2011-06-02 5:27 ` Paul Mundt
2011-05-26 17:38 ` [PATCH 3/5] v2 seccomp_filters: Enable ftrace-based system call filtering Valdis.Kletnieks
2011-05-26 18:08 ` Will Drewry
2011-05-26 18:22 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2011-05-26 17:07 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-05-26 18:43 ` Casey Schaufler
2011-05-26 18:54 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-05-26 18:34 ` david
2011-05-26 18:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-26 1:19 ` James Morris
2011-05-26 6:08 ` Avi Kivity
2011-05-26 8:24 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-26 8:35 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-05-26 8:49 ` Avi Kivity
2011-05-26 8:57 ` Pekka Enberg
[not found] ` <20110526085939.GG29458@redhat.com>
2011-05-26 10:38 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-26 10:46 ` Avi Kivity
2011-05-26 10:46 ` Gleb Natapov
2011-05-26 11:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-26 9:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-26 9:48 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-26 11:02 ` Avi Kivity
2011-05-26 11:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-26 10:56 ` Avi Kivity
2011-05-26 11:38 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-26 18:06 ` Avi Kivity
2011-05-26 18:15 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-26 18:20 ` Avi Kivity
2011-05-26 18:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-26 18:43 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2011-05-26 18:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-26 18:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-26 18:38 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-27 0:12 ` James Morris
2011-05-29 16:51 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-05-29 17:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-05-29 18:23 ` Al Viro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1306897845-9393-5-git-send-email-wad@chromium.org \
--to=wad@chromium.org \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=kees.cook@canonical.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®