From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: David Oliver <david@rgmadvisors.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Shawn Bohrer <sbohrer@rgmadvisors.com>,
Zachary Vonler <zvonler@rgmadvisors.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: Change in functionality of futex() system call.
Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2011 17:23:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1307373819.3098.40.camel@edumazet-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTinA9h=84gjYhus3EsNFL8tOUBe1jQ@mail.gmail.com>
Le lundi 06 juin 2011 à 09:28 -0500, David Oliver a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> The functionality of the futex() system call appears to have changed
> between versions 2.6.18 and 2.6.32.28.
>
> Specifically, performing a FUTEX_WAIT on a read-only mapped location
> results in an EFAULT. Although other operations, such as FUTEX_WAKE,
> are only meaningful for writable locations, FUTEX_WAIT is useful for
> processes with read-only access to a memory-mapped file.
>
> The code below illustrates the changed behavior (each of the EXPECT
> operations succeed on the older kernel, the ASSERTs pass in each
> case), assuming the file /tmp/futex_test exists and contains int(42).
>
> With the older kernel, the syscall() suspends until another process
> changes the file and issues a FUTEX_WAKE, whereas the new behavior is
> for an EFAULT error, independent of the file contents.
>
> Let me know if you need further clarification.
>
> Cheers!
>
> David Oliver.
>
>
> #include <errno.h>
> #include <fcntl.h>
> #include <stdint.h>
> typedef uint32_t u32; // for futex.h
> #include <linux/futex.h>
> #include <sys/mman.h>
> #include <sys/syscall.h>
> #include <unistd.h>
> #include "gtest/gtest.h" // test framework to illustrate issue.
>
>
> TEST(Futex, futex_in_read_only_file_is_ok) {
> int fd = open("/tmp/futex_test", O_RDONLY);
> ASSERT_GE(fd, 0);
> int* futex = static_cast<int *>(mmap(0, sizeof(int), PROT_READ,
> MAP_SHARED, fd, 0));
> ASSERT_NE((int *)(0), futex);
>
> int rc = syscall(SYS_futex, futex, FUTEX_WAIT, 42, 0, 0, 0);
>
> EXPECT_NE(-1, rc); // fails.
> if (rc == -1) {
> EXPECT_NE(errno, EFAULT); // fails.
> }
> }
>
Right you are, this came from commit 7485d0d3758e8e6491a5 (futexes:
Remove rw parameter from get_futex_key()) in 2.6.33
commit 7485d0d3758e8e6491a5c9468114e74dc050785d
Author: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Tue Jan 5 16:32:43 2010 +0900
futexes: Remove rw parameter from get_futex_key()
Currently, futexes have two problem:
A) The current futex code doesn't handle private file mappings properly.
get_futex_key() uses PageAnon() to distinguish file and
anon, which can cause the following bad scenario:
1) thread-A call futex(private-mapping, FUTEX_WAIT), it
sleeps on file mapping object.
2) thread-B writes a variable and it makes it cow.
3) thread-B calls futex(private-mapping, FUTEX_WAKE), it
wakes up blocked thread on the anonymous page. (but it's nothing)
B) Current futex code doesn't handle zero page properly.
Read mode get_user_pages() can return zero page, but current
futex code doesn't handle it at all. Then, zero page makes
infinite loop internally.
The solution is to use write mode get_user_page() always for
page lookup. It prevents the lookup of both file page of private
mappings and zero page.
Performance concerns:
Probaly very little, because glibc always initialize variables
for futex before to call futex(). It means glibc users never see
the overhead of this patch.
Compatibility concerns:
This patch has few compatibility issues. After this patch,
FUTEX_WAIT require writable access to futex variables (read-only
mappings makes EFAULT). But practically it's not a problem,
glibc always initalizes variables for futexes explicitly - nobody
uses read-only mappings.
Reported-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Darren Hart <dvhltc@us.ibm.com>
Cc: <stable@kernel.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Cc: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@gmail.com>
LKML-Reference: <20100105162633.45A2.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-06 15:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 99+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-06 14:28 David Oliver
2011-06-06 15:23 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2011-06-06 15:56 ` Shawn Bohrer
2011-06-06 16:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-06 16:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-06 16:22 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-06-06 16:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-06 16:42 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-06-06 17:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-06 17:11 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-06-06 17:27 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-06-06 17:56 ` Darren Hart
2011-06-06 18:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-06 18:27 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-06-25 0:00 ` Darren Hart
2011-06-27 16:48 ` Shawn Bohrer
2011-06-06 17:53 ` Darren Hart
2011-06-06 18:11 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-06-07 3:13 ` Darren Hart
2011-06-07 3:49 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-06-07 14:44 ` Andy Lutomirski
2011-06-07 15:56 ` Darren Hart
2011-06-07 15:58 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-06-07 18:43 ` Andrew Lutomirski
2011-06-07 19:01 ` Darren Hart
2011-06-07 19:04 ` Andrew Lutomirski
2011-06-07 19:06 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-06-07 19:10 ` David Oliver
2011-06-07 19:19 ` Andrew Lutomirski
2011-06-07 19:33 ` David Oliver
2011-06-07 19:53 ` Andrew Lutomirski
2011-06-07 20:04 ` David Oliver
2011-06-07 20:12 ` Andrew Lutomirski
2011-06-07 22:26 ` Kyle Moffett
2011-06-08 15:20 ` David Oliver
2011-06-08 15:21 ` Andrew Lutomirski
2011-06-08 16:21 ` Darren Hart
2011-06-09 11:37 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-06-09 12:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-09 17:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-10 3:30 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-06-10 3:26 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-06-07 18:30 ` Joel Becker
2011-06-09 12:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-10 12:10 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-06-10 17:29 ` Darren Hart
2011-06-13 2:11 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-06-13 15:50 ` Darren Hart
2011-06-15 18:50 ` Shawn Bohrer
2011-06-15 18:54 ` Darren Hart
2011-06-17 13:40 ` Shawn Bohrer
2011-06-22 19:19 ` [PATCH RFC] futex: Fix regression with read only mappings Shawn Bohrer
2011-06-22 20:14 ` Darren Hart
2011-06-23 2:51 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-06-23 15:26 ` Darren Hart
2011-06-23 19:49 ` Shawn Bohrer
2011-06-24 15:59 ` [PATCH v2] " Shawn Bohrer
2011-06-25 0:37 ` Darren Hart
2011-06-25 15:10 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-06-27 16:40 ` Shawn Bohrer
2011-06-27 18:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-27 20:41 ` Darren Hart
2011-06-27 21:08 ` Shawn Bohrer
2011-06-27 21:39 ` Darren Hart
2011-06-27 22:14 ` Shawn Bohrer
2011-06-27 23:17 ` Darren Hart
2011-06-27 22:22 ` [PATCH v3] " Shawn Bohrer
2011-06-28 10:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-28 14:52 ` Darren Hart
2011-06-28 17:38 ` Shawn Bohrer
2011-06-28 20:58 ` Darren Hart
2011-06-28 23:55 ` Darren Hart
2011-06-29 14:56 ` Shawn Bohrer
2011-06-29 15:17 ` [PATCH v4] " Shawn Bohrer
2011-06-29 18:41 ` Darren Hart
2011-06-29 23:38 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-06-30 4:19 ` Darren Hart
2011-06-30 14:02 ` David C. Oliver
2011-06-30 15:41 ` Darren Hart
2011-06-30 16:21 ` [PATCH v5] " Shawn Bohrer
2011-07-12 15:27 ` Shawn Bohrer
2011-07-25 15:20 ` Shawn Bohrer
2011-07-25 19:28 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-07-26 19:04 ` [tip:core/urgent] " tip-bot for Shawn Bohrer
2011-06-28 10:50 ` [PATCH v2] " Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-28 14:19 ` Darren Hart
2011-06-28 14:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-23 3:58 ` [PATCH RFC] " Shawn Bohrer
2011-06-23 3:23 ` Change in functionality of futex() system call KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-06-09 0:44 George Spelvin
2011-06-09 3:02 ` Darren Hart
2011-06-09 3:38 ` Andrew Lutomirski
2011-06-09 3:54 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-06-09 4:10 ` Andrew Lutomirski
2011-06-09 5:11 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-06-09 12:12 ` Andrew Lutomirski
2011-06-09 4:43 ` George Spelvin
2011-06-09 5:25 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-06-09 4:44 ` Kyle Moffett
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1307373819.3098.40.camel@edumazet-laptop \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=david@rgmadvisors.com \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sbohrer@rgmadvisors.com \
--cc=zvonler@rgmadvisors.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®