From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: [PATCH 0/4] sched: Make sleep inside atomic detection work on !PREEMPT
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 19:48:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1307555315-30989-1-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com> (raw)
Aside it may mostly avoid the need for a specific PROVE_RCU
check when we sleep inside an rcu read side critical section.
Better make sleeping inside atomic sections work everywhere.
Frederic Weisbecker (4):
sched: Remove pointless in_atomic() definition check
sched: Isolate preempt counting in its own config option
sched: Make sleeping inside spinlock detection working in
!CONFIG_PREEMPT
sched: Generalize sleep inside spinlock detection
Documentation/DocBook/kernel-hacking.tmpl | 2 +-
Documentation/SubmitChecklist | 2 +-
Documentation/development-process/4.Coding | 2 +-
Documentation/ja_JP/SubmitChecklist | 2 +-
Documentation/zh_CN/SubmitChecklist | 2 +-
include/linux/bit_spinlock.h | 2 +-
include/linux/hardirq.h | 4 ++--
include/linux/kernel.h | 2 +-
include/linux/pagemap.h | 4 ++--
include/linux/preempt.h | 26 +++++++++++++++++---------
include/linux/rcupdate.h | 12 ++++++------
include/linux/sched.h | 2 +-
kernel/Kconfig.preempt | 3 +++
kernel/sched.c | 6 ++----
lib/Kconfig.debug | 9 ++++++---
15 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
--
1.7.5.4
next reply other threads:[~2011-06-08 17:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-08 17:48 Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2011-06-08 17:48 ` [PATCH 1/4] sched: Remove pointless in_atomic() definition check Frederic Weisbecker
2011-06-08 17:48 ` [PATCH 2/4] sched: Isolate preempt counting in its own config option Frederic Weisbecker
2011-06-08 19:40 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-06-08 19:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-08 19:58 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-06-08 20:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-08 17:48 ` [PATCH 3/4] sched: Make sleeping inside spinlock detection working in !CONFIG_PREEMPT Frederic Weisbecker
2011-06-08 19:40 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-06-08 17:48 ` [PATCH 4/4] sched: Generalize sleep inside spinlock detection Frederic Weisbecker
2011-06-08 19:41 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-06-08 22:49 ` Bug: ACPI, scheduling while atomic (was Re: [PATCH 0/4] sched: Make sleep inside atomic detection work on !PREEMPT) Frederic Weisbecker
2011-08-25 3:57 ` Randy Dunlap
2011-08-27 15:32 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-09-26 22:33 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2011-09-26 22:54 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1307555315-30989-1-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com \
--to=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®