mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
	Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@gmail.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: select eligible run-queue for RT task
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 13:50:40 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1308160240.9218.129.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTinmZ1tSpbwV7448usb1nshw=FJXXA@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, 2011-06-03 at 22:06 +0800, Hillf Danton wrote:
> When selecting run-queue for a given task, eligible run-queue should be
> returned by checking the CPU affinity of task.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com>
> ---
>  kernel/sched_rt.c |    3 ++-
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/sched_rt.c b/kernel/sched_rt.c
> index 88725c9..45b3e0a 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched_rt.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched_rt.c
> @@ -1006,7 +1006,8 @@ select_task_rq_rt(struct task_struct *p, int
> sd_flag, int flags)
>  	int cpu;
> 
>  	if (sd_flag != SD_BALANCE_WAKE)
> -		return smp_processor_id();
> +		return cpumask_test_cpu(smp_processor_id(), &p->cpus_allowed) ?
> +			smp_processor_id() : task_cpu(p);

I wonder if we should bother even dhoing a test here. Perhaps a better
solution is just:

	if (sd_flag != SD_BALANCE_WAKE)
		return task_cpu(p);

-- Steve



  reply	other threads:[~2011-06-15 17:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-06-03 14:06 Hillf Danton
2011-06-15 17:50 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2011-06-16  3:19   ` Mike Galbraith
2011-06-16  3:51     ` Steven Rostedt
2011-06-16  4:24       ` Mike Galbraith

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1308160240.9218.129.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com \
    --to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=dhillf@gmail.com \
    --cc=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=yong.zhang0@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®