mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: "mingo@elte.hu" <mingo@elte.hu>,
	"tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"hpa@zytor.com" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	"trenn@novell.com" <trenn@novell.com>,
	"prarit@redhat.com" <prarit@redhat.com>,
	"tj@kernel.org" <tj@kernel.org>,
	"rusty@rustcorp.com.au" <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
	"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"torvalds@linux-foundation.org" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Song, Youquan" <youquan.song@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 3/4] stop_machine: implement stop_machine_from_offline_cpu()
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 11:19:13 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1308853153.15847.90.camel@sbsiddha-MOBL3.sc.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1308821119.1022.84.camel@twins>

On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 02:25 -0700, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-06-22 at 15:20 -0700, Suresh Siddha wrote:
> > +int stop_machine_from_offline_cpu(int (*fn)(void *), void *data,
> > +                                 const struct cpumask *cpus)
> > +{
> > +       struct stop_machine_data smdata = { .fn = fn, .data = data,
> > +                                           .active_cpus = cpus };
> > +       struct cpu_stop_done done;
> > +       int ret;
> > +
> > +       /* Local CPU must be offline and CPU hotplug in progress. */
> > +       BUG_ON(cpu_online(raw_smp_processor_id()));
> > +       smdata.num_threads = num_online_cpus() + 1;     /* +1 for local */
> > +
> > +       /* No proper task established and can't sleep - busy wait for lock. */
> > +       while (!mutex_trylock(&stop_cpus_mutex))
> > +               cpu_relax();
> > +
> > +       /* Schedule work on other CPUs and execute directly for local CPU */
> > +       set_state(&smdata, STOPMACHINE_PREPARE);
> > +       cpu_stop_init_done(&done, num_online_cpus());
> > +       queue_stop_cpus_work(cpu_online_mask, stop_machine_cpu_stop, &smdata,
> > +                            &done);
> > +       ret = stop_machine_cpu_stop(&smdata);
> > +
> > +       /* Busy wait for completion. */
> > +       while (!completion_done(&done.completion))
> > +               cpu_relax();
> > +
> > +       mutex_unlock(&stop_cpus_mutex);
> > +       return ret ?: done.ret;
> > +} 
> 
> Damn thats ugly, I sure hope you're going to make those hardware folks
> pay for this :-)

yeah, with more cores and sockets, this is becoming a pain. We will
bring this up with HW folks.

> 
> In commit d0af9eed5aa91b6b7b5049cae69e5ea956fd85c3 you mention that its
> specific to HT, wouldn't it make sense to limit the stop-machine use in
> the next patch to the sibling mask instead of the whole machine?

That specific issue was seen in the context of HT. But the SDM
guidelines (pre date HT and) are applicable for SMP too.

thanks,
suresh


  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-06-23 18:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-06-22 22:20 [patch 0/4] MTRR rendezvous deadlock fix and cleanups using stop_machine() Suresh Siddha
2011-06-22 22:20 ` [patch 1/4] x86, mtrr: lock stop machine during MTRR rendezvous sequence Suresh Siddha
2011-06-23  9:05   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-23  9:33     ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-06-23  9:41       ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-23 18:16       ` Suresh Siddha
2011-06-22 22:20 ` [patch 2/4] stop_machine: reorganize stop_cpus() implementation Suresh Siddha
2011-06-22 22:20 ` [patch 3/4] stop_machine: implement stop_machine_from_offline_cpu() Suresh Siddha
2011-06-23  9:25   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-23  9:28     ` Tejun Heo
2011-06-23  9:31       ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-23 18:19     ` Suresh Siddha [this message]
2011-06-24  7:45       ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-24 17:55         ` Suresh Siddha
2011-06-22 22:20 ` [patch 4/4] x86, mtrr: use stop_machine() for doing MTRR rendezvous Suresh Siddha

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1308853153.15847.90.camel@sbsiddha-MOBL3.sc.intel.com \
    --to=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=prarit@redhat.com \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=trenn@novell.com \
    --cc=youquan.song@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®