From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757524Ab1GASEP (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Jul 2011 14:04:15 -0400 Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([71.74.56.124]:55310 "EHLO hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756486Ab1GASEN (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Jul 2011 14:04:13 -0400 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=PfPQ8rIoTcZsncbPZjVSZ7K0hy8Zc4hmL68r4VPNpKE= c=1 sm=0 a=BMon_h8pASkA:10 a=5SG0PmZfjMsA:10 a=Q9fys5e9bTEA:10 a=OPBmh+XkhLl+Enan7BmTLg==:17 a=_Ubq8_g_6hdqfwj8LL0A:9 a=PUjeQqilurYA:10 a=OPBmh+XkhLl+Enan7BmTLg==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Originating-IP: 67.242.120.143 Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 05/13] seccomp_filter: Document what seccomp_filter is and how it works. From: Steven Rostedt To: Will Drewry Cc: Ingo Molnar , James Morris , Chris Evans , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds , djm@mindrot.org, segoon@openwall.com, kees.cook@canonical.com, fweisbec@gmail.com, tglx@linutronix.de, Randy Dunlap , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Eric Paris , linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, ksummit-2011-discuss@lists.linux-foundation.org In-Reply-To: References: <1308875813-20122-1-git-send-email-wad@chromium.org> <1308875813-20122-5-git-send-email-wad@chromium.org> <20110701115600.GK20990@elte.hu> <20110701130705.GG12605@elte.hu> <20110701161027.GA29035@elte.hu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15" Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2011 14:04:08 -0400 Message-ID: <1309543448.26417.156.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2011-07-01 at 11:43 -0500, Will Drewry wrote: > On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 11:10 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > I'd like to be able to move along security for the platform today and > not in two years, but if my only chance of any form of this being > ACK'd is to write it such that it shares code with perf and has a > shiny new ABI, then I'll queue up the work for when I can start trying > to tackle it. As this seems to be dragging on, and does not look to be solved by October, I would like to propose this topic for the Kernel Summit in Prague. I believe all parties involved may be there, and if not, I will push hard to get them there. Email is not always the best median for discussions. Face to face can usually solve things much quicker. -- Steve