From: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
To: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/3]CFQ: add think time check for service tree
Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2011 13:36:34 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1309757794.15392.238.camel@sli10-conroe> (raw)
Subject: CFQ: add think time check for service tree
Currently when the last queue of a service tree has no request, we don't
expire the queue to hope request from the service tree comes soon, so the
service tree doesn't miss its share. But if the think time is big, the
assumption isn't correct and we just waste bandwidth. In such case, we
don't do idle.
[global]
runtime=10
direct=1
[test1]
rw=randread
ioengine=libaio
size=500m
directory=/mnt
filename=file1
thinktime=9000
[test2]
rw=read
ioengine=libaio
size=1G
directory=/mnt
filename=file2
patched base
test1 41k/s 33k/s
test2 15868k/s 15789k/s
total 15902k/s 15817k/s
A slightly better
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
---
block/cfq-iosched.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Index: linux/block/cfq-iosched.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/block/cfq-iosched.c 2011-07-01 13:43:34.000000000 +0800
+++ linux/block/cfq-iosched.c 2011-07-01 13:45:24.000000000 +0800
@@ -74,6 +74,8 @@ static DEFINE_IDA(cic_index_ida);
#define sample_valid(samples) ((samples) > 80)
#define rb_entry_cfqg(node) rb_entry((node), struct cfq_group, rb_node)
+#define cfq_io_thinktime_big(ttime, slice) \
+ (sample_valid((ttime).ttime_samples) && (ttime).ttime_mean > (slice))
/*
* Most of our rbtree usage is for sorting with min extraction, so
@@ -87,9 +89,10 @@ struct cfq_rb_root {
unsigned count;
unsigned total_weight;
u64 min_vdisktime;
+ struct cfq_ttime ttime;
};
-#define CFQ_RB_ROOT (struct cfq_rb_root) { .rb = RB_ROOT, .left = NULL, \
- .count = 0, .min_vdisktime = 0, }
+#define CFQ_RB_ROOT (struct cfq_rb_root) { .rb = RB_ROOT, \
+ .ttime = {.last_end_request = jiffies,},}
/*
* Per process-grouping structure
@@ -1969,7 +1972,8 @@ static bool cfq_should_idle(struct cfq_d
* Otherwise, we do only if they are the last ones
* in their service tree.
*/
- if (service_tree->count == 1 && cfq_cfqq_sync(cfqq))
+ if (service_tree->count == 1 && cfq_cfqq_sync(cfqq) &&
+ !cfq_io_thinktime_big(service_tree->ttime, cfqd->cfq_slice_idle))
return true;
cfq_log_cfqq(cfqd, cfqq, "Not idling. st->count:%d",
service_tree->count);
@@ -3231,8 +3235,16 @@ static void
cfq_update_io_thinktime(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *cfqq,
struct cfq_io_context *cic)
{
- if (cfq_cfqq_sync(cfqq))
+ struct cfq_rb_root *service_tree;
+ struct cfq_group *cfqg = cfqq->cfqg;
+
+ if (cfq_cfqq_sync(cfqq)) {
__cfq_update_io_thinktime(&cic->ttime, cfqd->cfq_slice_idle);
+ service_tree = service_tree_for(cfqg, cfqq_prio(cfqq),
+ cfqq_type(cfqq));
+ __cfq_update_io_thinktime(&service_tree->ttime,
+ cfqd->cfq_slice_idle);
+ }
}
static void
@@ -3570,7 +3582,13 @@ static void cfq_completed_request(struct
cfqd->rq_in_flight[cfq_cfqq_sync(cfqq)]--;
if (sync) {
+ struct cfq_rb_root *service_tree;
+
RQ_CIC(rq)->ttime.last_end_request = now;
+
+ service_tree = service_tree_for(cfqq->cfqg, cfqq_prio(cfqq),
+ cfqq_type(cfqq));
+ service_tree->ttime.last_end_request = now;
if (!time_after(rq->start_time + cfqd->cfq_fifo_expire[1], now))
cfqd->last_delayed_sync = now;
}
next reply other threads:[~2011-07-04 5:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-04 5:36 Shaohua Li [this message]
2011-07-05 14:10 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-07-06 1:57 ` Shaohua Li
2011-07-06 15:01 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-07-07 6:17 ` Shaohua Li
2011-07-12 1:37 Shaohua Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1309757794.15392.238.camel@sli10-conroe \
--to=shaohua.li@intel.com \
--cc=jaxboe@fusionio.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®