From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755133Ab1GEUXg (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Jul 2011 16:23:36 -0400 Received: from avon.wwwdotorg.org ([70.85.31.133]:56072 "EHLO avon.wwwdotorg.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754036Ab1GEUXf (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Jul 2011 16:23:35 -0400 From: Stephen Warren To: Grant Likely Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, Stephen Warren Subject: [PATCH] ARM: tegra: Harmony: Use engineering names in DT compatible property Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2011 14:23:28 -0600 Message-Id: <1309897408-23085-1-git-send-email-swarren@nvidia.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.7.0.4 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Engineering names are more stable than marketing names. Hence, use them for Device Tree compatible properties instead. Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren --- Grant, this is against devicetree/arm, and only makes sense there; I'll send a separate patch for the equivalent change in devicetree/test, since the file is radically different there. arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra-harmony.dts | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra-harmony.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra-harmony.dts index 81032e7..4ad8ade 100644 --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra-harmony.dts +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra-harmony.dts @@ -3,5 +3,5 @@ / { model = "NVIDIA Tegra2 Harmony evaluation board"; - compatible = "nvidia,harmony", "nvidia,tegra250"; + compatible = "nvidia,harmony", "nvidia,tegra20"; }; -- 1.7.0.4