From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@elte.hu, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca,
josh@joshtriplett.org, niv@us.ibm.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
peterz@infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, dhowells@redhat.com,
eric.dumazet@gmail.com, darren@dvhart.com, patches@linaro.org,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 4/6] rcu: Remove one layer of abstraction from PROVE_RCU checking
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2011 08:43:51 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1310139833-20804-4-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110708154331.GA20161@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Simplify things a bit by substituting the definitions of the single-line
rcu_read_acquire(), rcu_read_release(), rcu_read_acquire_bh(),
rcu_read_release_bh(), rcu_read_acquire_sched(), and
rcu_read_release_sched() functions at their call points.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
include/linux/rcupdate.h | 53 +++++++---------------------------------------
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate.h b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
index bf2c316..3fc3aeb 100644
--- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h
+++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
@@ -202,41 +202,8 @@ static inline void rcu_lock_release(struct lockdep_map *map)
}
extern struct lockdep_map rcu_lock_map;
-
-static inline void rcu_read_acquire(void)
-{
- rcu_lock_acquire(&rcu_lock_map);
-}
-
-static inline void rcu_read_release(void)
-{
- rcu_lock_release(&rcu_lock_map);
-}
-
extern struct lockdep_map rcu_bh_lock_map;
-
-static inline void rcu_read_acquire_bh(void)
-{
- rcu_lock_acquire(&rcu_bh_lock_map);
-}
-
-static inline void rcu_read_release_bh(void)
-{
- rcu_lock_release(&rcu_bh_lock_map);
-}
-
extern struct lockdep_map rcu_sched_lock_map;
-
-static inline void rcu_read_acquire_sched(void)
-{
- rcu_lock_acquire(&rcu_sched_lock_map);
-}
-
-static inline void rcu_read_release_sched(void)
-{
- rcu_lock_release(&rcu_sched_lock_map);
-}
-
extern int debug_lockdep_rcu_enabled(void);
/**
@@ -327,12 +294,8 @@ static inline int rcu_read_lock_sched_held(void)
#else /* #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC */
-# define rcu_read_acquire() do { } while (0)
-# define rcu_read_release() do { } while (0)
-# define rcu_read_acquire_bh() do { } while (0)
-# define rcu_read_release_bh() do { } while (0)
-# define rcu_read_acquire_sched() do { } while (0)
-# define rcu_read_release_sched() do { } while (0)
+# define rcu_lock_acquire(a) do { } while (0)
+# define rcu_lock_release(a) do { } while (0)
static inline int rcu_read_lock_held(void)
{
@@ -659,7 +622,7 @@ static inline void rcu_read_lock(void)
{
__rcu_read_lock();
__acquire(RCU);
- rcu_read_acquire();
+ rcu_lock_acquire(&rcu_lock_map);
}
/*
@@ -679,7 +642,7 @@ static inline void rcu_read_lock(void)
*/
static inline void rcu_read_unlock(void)
{
- rcu_read_release();
+ rcu_lock_release(&rcu_lock_map);
__release(RCU);
__rcu_read_unlock();
}
@@ -700,7 +663,7 @@ static inline void rcu_read_lock_bh(void)
{
__rcu_read_lock_bh();
__acquire(RCU_BH);
- rcu_read_acquire_bh();
+ rcu_lock_acquire(&rcu_bh_lock_map);
}
/*
@@ -710,7 +673,7 @@ static inline void rcu_read_lock_bh(void)
*/
static inline void rcu_read_unlock_bh(void)
{
- rcu_read_release_bh();
+ rcu_lock_release(&rcu_bh_lock_map);
__release(RCU_BH);
__rcu_read_unlock_bh();
}
@@ -727,7 +690,7 @@ static inline void rcu_read_lock_sched(void)
{
preempt_disable();
__acquire(RCU_SCHED);
- rcu_read_acquire_sched();
+ rcu_lock_acquire(&rcu_sched_lock_map);
}
/* Used by lockdep and tracing: cannot be traced, cannot call lockdep. */
@@ -744,7 +707,7 @@ static inline notrace void rcu_read_lock_sched_notrace(void)
*/
static inline void rcu_read_unlock_sched(void)
{
- rcu_read_release_sched();
+ rcu_lock_release(&rcu_sched_lock_map);
__release(RCU_SCHED);
preempt_enable();
}
--
1.7.3.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-08 15:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-08 15:43 [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/6] Check for use of RCU from dyntick-idle mode Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-08 15:43 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 1/6] rcu: Detect illegal rcu dereference in extended quiescent state Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-08 15:43 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 2/6] rcu: Inform the user about dynticks-idle mode on PROVE_RCU warning Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-08 15:43 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 3/6] rcu: Warn when rcu_read_lock() is used in extended quiescent state Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-08 15:43 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2011-07-08 15:43 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 5/6] rcu: Warn when srcu_read_lock() is used in an " Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-08 15:43 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 6/6] rcu: Make srcu_read_lock_held() call common lockdep-enabled function Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-11 16:03 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/6] Check for use of RCU from dyntick-idle mode Frederic Weisbecker
2011-07-11 16:38 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-11 16:44 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-07-11 17:00 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-11 18:10 ` Frederic Weisbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1310139833-20804-4-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=darren@dvhart.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=niv@us.ibm.com \
--cc=patches@linaro.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome