From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757520Ab1GMBhE (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Jul 2011 21:37:04 -0400 Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([71.74.56.123]:53986 "EHLO hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755008Ab1GMBhB (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Jul 2011 21:37:01 -0400 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=PfPQ8rIoTcZsncbPZjVSZ7K0hy8Zc4hmL68r4VPNpKE= c=1 sm=0 a=WrRwyXlJCEoA:10 a=5SG0PmZfjMsA:10 a=Q9fys5e9bTEA:10 a=OPBmh+XkhLl+Enan7BmTLg==:17 a=9IeuSSz_9l2xTLTEHZAA:9 a=PUjeQqilurYA:10 a=OPBmh+XkhLl+Enan7BmTLg==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Originating-IP: 67.242.120.143 Subject: Re: [patch 10/11] sh/unicore32/irqs: Do not trace arch_local_{*,irq_*} functions From: Steven Rostedt To: Paul Mundt Cc: gxt@mprc.pku.edu.cn, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Thomas Gleixner In-Reply-To: <20110711033418.GF24169@linux-sh.org> References: <20110702030435.308336775@goodmis.org> <20110702033854.432833160@goodmis.org> <1309744599.2291.1.camel@epip-laptop> <1309870230.26417.171.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> <20110711033418.GF24169@linux-sh.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15" Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 21:36:57 -0400 Message-ID: <1310521017.3931.19.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2011-07-11 at 12:34 +0900, Paul Mundt wrote: > On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 08:50:30AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > > Are you or Paul going to pull it into the sh tree? > > > I don't mind pulling it in, but it's probably easier to simply have it > lumped with the rest of the changes. Hi Paul, This "patch series" was just a email to all arch maintainers to the code I modified. I'm not pulling this into any branch nor have I asked for this series to go anywhere. This change is not dependent on any other change nor is any other change dependent on this one. So I figured that each maintainer could pull it in at their own free will. Thanks! -- Steve