From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>, Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>,
Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>,
npiggin@kernel.dk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Patch] VFS : mount lock scalability for files systems without mount point (WAS vfsmount lock issues on very large ppc64 box)
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 08:00:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1311660013.2996.6.camel@edumazet-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1311636178.2576.34.camel@schen9-DESK>
Le lundi 25 juillet 2011 à 16:22 -0700, Tim Chen a écrit :
> On Mon, 2011-07-25 at 23:51 +0100, Al Viro wrote:
>
> > It's mostly merged in mainline already... BTW, you forgot to export
> > that sucker - mtdchar can be modular.
>
> Thanks for fixing it up and merging it.
>
Next step is to not chain pipes/sockets into superblock s_inodes list
inode_sb_list_add()/inode_sb_list_del() is the very last contention
point because of spin_lock(&inode_sb_list_lock);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-26 6:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-17 0:50 vfsmount lock issues on very large ppc64 box Anton Blanchard
2011-07-17 1:04 ` Matthew Wilcox
2011-07-17 8:46 ` Andi Kleen
2011-07-18 8:17 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-07-18 15:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-18 15:51 ` Al Viro
2011-07-19 16:32 ` [Patch] VFS : mount lock scalability for files systems without mount point (WAS vfsmount lock issues on very large ppc64 box) Tim Chen
2011-07-21 20:40 ` Al Viro
2011-07-22 0:27 ` Tim Chen
2011-07-23 13:24 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-25 22:39 ` Tim Chen
2011-07-25 22:51 ` Al Viro
2011-07-25 23:22 ` Tim Chen
2011-07-26 6:00 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2011-07-26 8:21 ` [PATCH] vfs: dont chain pipe/anon/socket on superblock s_inodes list Eric Dumazet
2011-07-26 9:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-26 9:36 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-07-26 9:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-26 10:43 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-07-26 11:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-27 15:21 ` [PATCH] vfs: avoid taking locks if inode not in lists Eric Dumazet
2011-07-27 17:12 ` Andi Kleen
2011-07-27 20:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-27 20:59 ` Andi Kleen
2011-07-27 21:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-28 4:11 ` [PATCH] vfs: conditionally call inode_wb_list_del() Eric Dumazet
2011-07-28 4:41 ` [PATCH] vfs: avoid taking locks if inode not in lists Eric Dumazet
2011-07-28 4:55 ` [PATCH] vfs: avoid call to inode_lru_list_del() if possible Eric Dumazet
2011-07-18 16:41 ` vfsmount lock issues on very large ppc64 box Tim Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1311660013.2996.6.camel@edumazet-laptop \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=anton@samba.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthew@wil.cx \
--cc=npiggin@kernel.dk \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®