From: Todd Poynor <toddpoynor@google.com>
To: Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>
Cc: rtc-linux@googlegroups.com, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Todd Poynor <toddpoynor@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] rtc: twl: Use threaded IRQ, remove IRQ enable in interrupt handler
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 00:07:20 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1311750441-5559-1-git-send-email-toddpoynor@google.com> (raw)
IRQs disabled on entry to twl_rtc_interrupt is not a consequence
of LOCKDEP; both twl6030 and twl4030 explicitly disable IRQs
before calling the module IRQ handlers.
The ISR should not be enabling IRQs; use a threaded IRQ handler
instead.
Also fixes warnings:
WARNING: at kernel/irq/handle.c:130 handle_irq_event_percpu+nnn
irq nnn handler twl_rtc_interrupt+nnn enabled interrupts
Signed-off-by: Todd Poynor <toddpoynor@google.com>
---
drivers/rtc/rtc-twl.c | 14 +++-----------
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-twl.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-twl.c
index 9a81f77..ece41b9 100644
--- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-twl.c
+++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-twl.c
@@ -362,14 +362,6 @@ static irqreturn_t twl_rtc_interrupt(int irq, void *rtc)
int res;
u8 rd_reg;
-#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP
- /* WORKAROUND for lockdep forcing IRQF_DISABLED on us, which
- * we don't want and can't tolerate. Although it might be
- * friendlier not to borrow this thread context...
- */
- local_irq_enable();
-#endif
-
res = twl_rtc_read_u8(&rd_reg, REG_RTC_STATUS_REG);
if (res)
goto out;
@@ -462,9 +454,9 @@ static int __devinit twl_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
if (ret < 0)
goto out1;
- ret = request_irq(irq, twl_rtc_interrupt,
- IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING,
- dev_name(&rtc->dev), rtc);
+ ret = request_threaded_irq(irq, NULL, twl_rtc_interrupt,
+ IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING,
+ dev_name(&rtc->dev), rtc);
if (ret < 0) {
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "IRQ is not free.\n");
goto out1;
--
1.7.3.1
next reply other threads:[~2011-07-27 7:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-27 7:07 Todd Poynor [this message]
2011-07-27 7:07 ` [PATCH 2/2] rtc: twl: Fix registration vs. init order Todd Poynor
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1311750441-5559-1-git-send-email-toddpoynor@google.com \
--to=toddpoynor@google.com \
--cc=a.zummo@towertech.it \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rtc-linux@googlegroups.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®