From: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
To: Vince Weaver <vweaver1@eecs.utk.edu>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>
Subject: Re: [perf] overflow/perf_count_sw_cpu_clock crashes recent kernels
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 10:39:47 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1311820787.3938.1551.camel@minggr.sh.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAF1ivSZkC71V+ownS+k0Qmi3S_HfETBkK3D+U4FYFZ=cojmoGg@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, 2011-07-28 at 09:54 +0800, Lin Ming wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 2:51 AM, Vince Weaver <vweaver1@eecs.utk.edu> wrote:
> > Hello
> >
> >> With 3.0.0 the PAPI "overflow_allcounters" test reliably locks up my
> >> Nehalem system.
> >
> > I finally managed to narrow this down to a small test, which is attached.
> >
> > Basically measuring overflow on the perf::perf_count_sw_cpu_clock
> > event will potentially *lock up* your system from user-space.
> >
> > This seems to be a long standing bug. It will quickly lock solid
> > my Nehalem test box on 3.0, 2.6.39 and 2.6.38.
> >
> > On a Core2 2.6.32 box the crash testing program will wedge and become
> > unkillable, but it doesn't actually kill the machine.
Hi, Vince
I re-tested current -tip tree(commit 0931941) and it works OK now.
$ ./oflo_sw_cpu_clock_crash
Matrix multiply sum: s=27665734022509.746094
Total overflows: 3460
Could you also have a try the current -tip tree?
Lin Ming
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-28 2:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-22 16:13 [perf] 3.0 overflow test locks up system Vince Weaver
2011-07-27 18:51 ` [perf] overflow/perf_count_sw_cpu_clock crashes recent kernels Vince Weaver
2011-07-28 1:54 ` Lin Ming
2011-07-28 2:39 ` Lin Ming [this message]
2011-07-28 18:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-07-29 5:05 ` [stable] " Greg KH
2011-07-29 11:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-02 16:35 ` Greg KH
2011-08-03 11:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1311820787.3938.1551.camel@minggr.sh.intel.com \
--to=ming.m.lin@intel.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=acme@ghostprotocols.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=vweaver1@eecs.utk.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®