From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753105Ab1GaXNS (ORCPT ); Sun, 31 Jul 2011 19:13:18 -0400 Received: from casper.infradead.org ([85.118.1.10]:52977 "EHLO casper.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752847Ab1GaXNL (ORCPT ); Sun, 31 Jul 2011 19:13:11 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] um: Use __i386__ in ifdef for vsyscall exports, not SUBARCH_i386 From: David Woodhouse To: Al Viro Cc: richard -rw- weinberger , Arnaud Lacombe , "H. Peter Anvin" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2011 00:13:07 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20110731225801.GD2203@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: <1312066693.22074.50.camel@i7.infradead.org> <1312066923.22074.53.camel@i7.infradead.org> <1312151063.18010.25.camel@i7.infradead.org> <20110731224834.GC2203@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20110731225801.GD2203@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.0.2 (3.0.2-3.fc15) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <1312153988.18010.39.camel@i7.infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by casper.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 2011-07-31 at 23:58 +0100, Al Viro wrote: > FWIW, the next step (still not pushed there) is to move arch/um/sys-x86 to > arch/x86/um, with arch/um/os-Linux/sys-x86 becoming arch/x86/um/os-Linux, > Kconfig.x86 moving to arch/x86/um/Kconfig and Makefile-x86 - to > arch/x86/um/Makefile.defs. Next after that - arch/powerpc/um (and yes, > it means resurrected uml/ppc port; for now - only ppc32, since I have no > ppc64 boxen to test on). I can give you an account on a ppc64 box if that would help... What you've done so far, with the one extra patch I just sent, seems perfectly sufficient to make it cope with SUBARCH defaulting to x86 instead of to i386 or x86_64. Are you happy to push it before you do the rest of the refactoring/moving? -- dwmw2