From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752965Ab1HAR6l (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Aug 2011 13:58:41 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:1109 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752243Ab1HAR6c (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Aug 2011 13:58:32 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] libertas: prioritize usb8388_v5.bin firmware on OLPC machines From: Dan Williams To: Daniel Drake Cc: Andres Salomon , cjb@laptop.org, David Woodhouse , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, libertas-dev@lists.infradead.org Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2011 12:17:23 -0500 In-Reply-To: References: <20110731000300.5c08e95f@debxo> <20110731000521.45e48638@debxo> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <1312219075.6121.20.camel@dcbw.foobar.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 2011-07-31 at 13:59 +0100, Daniel Drake wrote: > On 31 July 2011 08:05, Andres Salomon wrote: > > Note: I've not tested this out yet on an XO-1. I'll do that after some > > feedback regarding the matching linux-firmware pull request. This > > should address dsd's concern about changing the loading order of the > > firmware. > > That indeed was a concern, but only until Dan Williams and Chris > pointed out that OLPC is the only usb8388 user. With that in mind, I > am in agreement with them that simply putting usb8388_olpc_v5.bin (or > whatever name is chosen) at the top of the firmware loading list is > the best option. Yeah, patches for that would be immediately acked. Dan