From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753240Ab1HHHEE (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Aug 2011 03:04:04 -0400 Received: from ipmail04.adl6.internode.on.net ([150.101.137.141]:11427 "EHLO ipmail04.adl6.internode.on.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752954Ab1HHHD7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Aug 2011 03:03:59 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AtUHAMKHP055LbAB/2dsb2JhbABCmDGPBniCHSMYgQIDxCiGRgSjfA From: Dave Chinner To: viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH 0/2] dcache: per-sb LRU locks Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2011 17:03:39 +1000 Message-Id: <1312787021-11324-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.7.5.4 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Al, This is the missing piece of the per-sb shrinker patchset - I dropped it because it was causing problems. Now that you've fixed a bunch of problems in the dcache code, the conversion to per-sb LRU locks for the dcache no longer causes my systems to crash and burn. It's been stable for the past couple of weeks, so it's time for more review and wider testing.... Cheers, Dave.