From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: fweisbec@gmail.com, mingo@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/10] tracing/filter: Change filter_match_preds function to use walk_pred_tree
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 17:16:32 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1313010992.18583.276.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1313010869.18583.274.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
On Wed, 2011-08-10 at 17:14 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-08-04 at 12:08 +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > Changing filter_match_preds function to use unified predicates tree
> > processing.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > kernel/trace/trace_events_filter.c | 119 +++++++++++++++++-------------------
> > 1 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_events_filter.c b/kernel/trace/trace_events_filter.c
> > index d4e0c09..55b13b9 100644
> > --- a/kernel/trace/trace_events_filter.c
> > +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_events_filter.c
> > @@ -467,6 +467,7 @@ static int process_ops(struct filter_pred *preds,
> >
> > for (i = 0; i < op->val; i++) {
> > pred = &preds[op->ops[i]];
> > + BUG_ON(!pred->fn);
>
> Why the added BUG_ON()s? Do we really need to crash the kernel on error
> here?
I mean, could be instead have:
if (!WARN_ON_ONCE(!pred->fn))
> > match = pred->fn(pred, rec);
> > if (!!match == type)
> > return match;
> > @@ -474,92 +475,82 @@ static int process_ops(struct filter_pred *preds,
> > return match;
> > }
> >
> > +struct filter_match_preds_data {
> > + struct filter_pred *preds;
> > + int match;
> > + void *rec;
> > +};
> > +
> > +static int filter_match_preds_cb(enum move_type move, struct filter_pred *pred,
> > + int *err, void *data)
> > +{
> > + struct filter_match_preds_data *d = data;
> > +
> > + *err = 0;
> > + switch (move) {
> > + case MOVE_DOWN:
> > + /* only AND and OR have children */
> > + if (pred->left != FILTER_PRED_INVALID) {
> > + /* If ops is set, then it was folded. */
> > + if (!pred->ops)
> > + return WALK_PRED_DEFAULT;
> > + /* We can treat folded ops as a leaf node */
> > + d->match = process_ops(d->preds, pred, d->rec);
> > + } else {
> > + BUG_ON(!pred->fn);
if (!WARN_ON_ONCE(!pred->fn))
> > + d->match = pred->fn(pred, d->rec);
-- Steve
> > + }
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-10 21:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-04 10:08 [PATCH 0/10] ftrace/filter: Trace events filtering related fixies Jiri Olsa
2011-08-04 10:08 ` [PATCH 01/10] tracing/filter: Use static allocation for filter predicates Jiri Olsa
2011-08-04 10:08 ` [PATCH 02/10] tracing/filter: Separate predicate init and filter addition Jiri Olsa
2011-08-10 20:51 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-08-04 10:08 ` [PATCH 03/10] tracing/filter: Remove field_name from filter_pred struct Jiri Olsa
2011-08-04 10:08 ` [PATCH 04/10] tracing/filter: Simplify tracepoint event lookup Jiri Olsa
2011-08-04 10:08 ` [PATCH 05/10] tracing/filter: Unify predicate tree walking, change check_pred_tree function to use it Jiri Olsa
2011-08-04 10:08 ` [PATCH 06/10] tracing/filter: Change count_leafs function to use walk_pred_tree Jiri Olsa
2011-08-10 21:05 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-08-04 10:08 ` [PATCH 07/10] tracing/filter: Change fold_pred_tree " Jiri Olsa
2011-08-04 10:08 ` [PATCH 08/10] tracing/filter: Change fold_pred " Jiri Olsa
2011-08-04 10:08 ` [PATCH 09/10] tracing/filter: Change filter_match_preds " Jiri Olsa
2011-08-10 21:14 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-08-10 21:16 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2011-08-04 10:08 ` [PATCH 10/10] tracing/filter: Add startup tests for events filter Jiri Olsa
2011-08-04 11:22 ` [PATCHv2 " Jiri Olsa
2011-08-10 21:24 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-08-10 21:25 ` [PATCH 0/10] ftrace/filter: Trace events filtering related fixies Steven Rostedt
2011-08-11 14:21 ` Jiri Olsa
2011-08-11 14:25 ` [PATCHv2 " Jiri Olsa
2011-08-11 14:25 ` [PATCHv2 01/10] tracing/filter: Use static allocation for filter predicates Jiri Olsa
2011-08-11 14:25 ` [PATCHv2 02/10] tracing/filter: Separate predicate init and filter addition Jiri Olsa
2011-08-11 14:25 ` [PATCHv2 03/10] tracing/filter: Remove field_name from filter_pred struct Jiri Olsa
2011-08-11 14:25 ` [PATCHv2 04/10] tracing/filter: Simplify tracepoint event lookup Jiri Olsa
2011-08-11 14:25 ` [PATCHv2 05/10] tracing/filter: Unify predicate tree walking, change check_pred_tree function to use it Jiri Olsa
2011-08-11 14:25 ` [PATCHv2 06/10] tracing/filter: Change count_leafs function to use walk_pred_tree Jiri Olsa
2011-08-11 14:25 ` [PATCHv2 07/10] tracing/filter: Change fold_pred_tree " Jiri Olsa
2011-08-11 14:25 ` [PATCHv2 08/10] tracing/filter: Change fold_pred " Jiri Olsa
2011-08-11 14:25 ` [PATCHv2 09/10] tracing/filter: Change filter_match_preds " Jiri Olsa
2011-08-11 14:25 ` [PATCHv2 10/10] tracing/filter: Add startup tests for events filter Jiri Olsa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1313010992.18583.276.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®