From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752537Ab1HPTlF (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Aug 2011 15:41:05 -0400 Received: from arkanian.console-pimps.org ([212.110.184.194]:36385 "EHLO arkanian.console-pimps.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752266Ab1HPTlB (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Aug 2011 15:41:01 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/41] signal: Use set_current_blocked() From: Matt Fleming To: Oleg Nesterov Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20110811160358.GA7989@redhat.com> References: <1313071035-12047-1-git-send-email-matt@console-pimps.org> <20110811160358.GA7989@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 20:40:59 +0100 Message-ID: <1313523659.3436.184.camel@mfleming-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.2 (2.32.2-1.fc14) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 18:03 +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > I'll try to read this carefully on weekend though. I do not expect I'll > find any problem, just may be a couple of nits about the changelogs. > Say, 41/41... doesn't hurt, but in fact the current code is fine as is. Thanks for the review Oleg! Did you want me to send just the updated versions of patches or the entire series again? It would seem over the top to send the entire series. Also, are you going to pull these patches into your tree and send them to Linus or would it be better to route them through -mm? -- Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center