From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755560Ab1HRLJY (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Aug 2011 07:09:24 -0400 Received: from arkanian.console-pimps.org ([212.110.184.194]:47866 "EHLO arkanian.console-pimps.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752123Ab1HRLJW (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Aug 2011 07:09:22 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/41] signal: Use set_current_blocked() From: Matt Fleming To: Oleg Nesterov Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <1313619446.2311.52.camel@mfleming-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <1313071035-12047-1-git-send-email-matt@console-pimps.org> <20110811160358.GA7989@redhat.com> <1313523659.3436.184.camel@mfleming-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com> <20110817170152.GA22499@redhat.com> <1313619446.2311.52.camel@mfleming-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 12:09:15 +0100 Message-ID: <1313665755.2311.57.camel@mfleming-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.2 (2.32.2-1.fc14) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2011-08-17 at 23:17 +0100, Matt Fleming wrote: > > This does look like a decent clean up, especially because so many > architectures got this sequence wrong in the past. But yeah, it will > require me to rewrite half my series ;-) > > Is it worth rewriting the series? Dunno. I'm not convinced that the > wrapper buys us enough for that, plus it'd increase the number of > patches. > > Maybe it'd be better to do it as a separate set of patches? OK so, I went ahead and rewrote the series using your clean up. It's in the 'oleg/set-current-blocked-v2' branch at, git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mfleming/linux-2.6.git Would you mind taking a quick look and see which series you prefer? I'll wait for your reply before I resend any patches. -- Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center