From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753149Ab1HVORK (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Aug 2011 10:17:10 -0400 Received: from merlin.infradead.org ([205.233.59.134]:48719 "EHLO merlin.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753003Ab1HVORI convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Aug 2011 10:17:08 -0400 Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/6] x86, nmi: create new NMI handler routines From: Peter Zijlstra To: Don Zickus Cc: x86@kernel.org, Andi Kleen , Robert Richter , ying.huang@intel.com, LKML , jason.wessel@windriver.com Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 16:16:20 +0200 In-Reply-To: <1313786266-9585-3-git-send-email-dzickus@redhat.com> References: <1313786266-9585-1-git-send-email-dzickus@redhat.com> <1313786266-9585-3-git-send-email-dzickus@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-Mailer: Evolution 3.0.2- Message-ID: <1314022580.24275.33.camel@twins> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2011-08-19 at 16:37 -0400, Don Zickus wrote: > +static struct nmiaction *__free_nmi(unsigned int type, const char *name) > +{ > + struct nmi_desc *desc = nmi_to_desc(type); > + struct nmiaction *n, **np = &(desc->head); > + unsigned long flags; > + > + spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock, flags); > + ... > + > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&desc->lock, flags); > + synchronize_rcu(); > + return *np; > +} > +void unregister_nmi_handler(unsigned int type, const char *name) > +{ > + kfree(__free_nmi(type, name)); > +} This code is weird.. why not have the kfree() in __free_nmi(), also why use sync_rcu() and not use kfree_rcu()? > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(unregister_nmi_handler); *g*, so binary modules can register an NMI handler, but can't unregister it..?