From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753466Ab1HXSWa (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Aug 2011 14:22:30 -0400 Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:7635 "EHLO mga02.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752651Ab1HXSW1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Aug 2011 14:22:27 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.67,352,1309762800"; d="scan'208";a="41814017" Subject: Re: [patch 8/8] iommu: rename the DMAR and INTR_REMAP config options From: Suresh Siddha Reply-To: Suresh Siddha To: "Roedel, Joerg" Cc: Yinghai Lu , "mingo@elte.hu" , "tglx@linutronix.de" , "hpa@zytor.com" , "dwmw2@infradead.org" , "Song, Youquan" , "Luck, Tony" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 11:25:33 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20110824082848.GZ2079@amd.com> References: <20110824000517.710353624@sbsiddha-desk.sc.intel.com> <20110824001456.558630224@sbsiddha-desk.sc.intel.com> <4E549E9B.7080004@kernel.org> <20110824082848.GZ2079@amd.com> Organization: Intel Corp Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.0.1 (3.0.1-1.fc15) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <1314210333.16133.9.camel@sbsiddha-desk.sc.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 01:28 -0700, Roedel, Joerg wrote: > On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 02:47:55AM -0400, Yinghai Lu wrote: > > On 08/23/2011 05:05 PM, Suresh Siddha wrote: > > > Change the CONFIG_DMAR to CONFIG_INTEL_IOMMU to be consistent with the other > > > IOMMU options. > > > > > > Rename the CONFIG_INTR_REMAP to CONFIG_IRQ_REMAP to match the irq > > > subsystem name. > > > > > > And define the CONFIG_DMAR_TABLE for the common ACPI DMAR routines > > > shared by both CONFIG_INTEL_IOMMU and CONFIG_IRQ_REMAP. > > > > is there something like IRQ_REMAP from AMD? > > Yes there is. And I digged already through the existing VT-d code to see > how it can be implemented side by side. Doesn't seem easy but should be > doable. And it is on my list for the not too-distant future. yeah I was not sure how different AMD's implementation is and so left it as generic IRQ_REMAP. We can revisit this when the AMD's implementation comes alive. thanks, suresh