From: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
To: rjw@sisk.pl, paul@paulmenage.org, lizf@cn.fujitsu.com
Cc: linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
containers@lists.linux-foundation.org, fweisbec@gmail.com,
matthltc@us.ibm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Paul Menage <menage@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] threadgroup: extend threadgroup_lock() to cover exit and exec
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 03:01:19 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1315159280-25032-4-git-send-email-htejun@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1315159280-25032-1-git-send-email-htejun@gmail.com>
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
threadgroup_lock() protected only protected against new addition to
the threadgroup, which was inherently somewhat incomplete and
problematic for its only user cgroup. On-going migration could race
against exec and exit leading to interesting problems - the symmetry
between various attach methods, task exiting during method execution,
->exit() racing against attach methods, migrating task switching basic
properties during exec and so on.
This patch extends threadgroup_lock() such that it protects against
all three threadgroup altering operations - fork, exit and exec. For
exit, threadgroup_change_begin/end() calls are added to exit path.
For exec, threadgroup_[un]lock() are updated to also grab and release
cred_guard_mutex.
With this change, threadgroup_lock() guarantees that the target
threadgroup will remain stable - no new task will be added, no new
PF_EXITING will be set and exec won't happen.
The next patch will update cgroup so that it can take full advantage
of this change.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Paul Menage <menage@google.com>
Cc: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
include/linux/sched.h | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
kernel/exit.c | 16 ++++++++++++----
2 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index da74d6f..179cbdc 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -635,11 +635,12 @@ struct signal_struct {
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUPS
/*
- * The group_rwsem prevents threads from forking with
- * CLONE_THREAD while held for writing. Use this for fork-sensitive
- * threadgroup-wide operations. It's taken for reading in fork.c in
- * copy_process().
- * Currently only needed write-side by cgroups.
+ * group_rwsem prevents new tasks from entering the threadgroup and
+ * member tasks from exiting. fork and exit paths are protected
+ * with this rwsem using threadgroup_change_begin/end(). Users
+ * which require threadgroup to remain stable should use
+ * threadgroup_[un]lock() which also takes care of exec path.
+ * Currently, cgroup is the only user.
*/
struct rw_semaphore group_rwsem;
#endif
@@ -2364,7 +2365,6 @@ static inline void unlock_task_sighand(struct task_struct *tsk,
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tsk->sighand->siglock, *flags);
}
-/* See the declaration of group_rwsem in signal_struct. */
#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUPS
static inline void threadgroup_change_begin(struct task_struct *tsk)
{
@@ -2374,13 +2374,33 @@ static inline void threadgroup_change_done(struct task_struct *tsk)
{
up_read(&tsk->signal->group_rwsem);
}
+
+/**
+ * threadgroup_lock - lock threadgroup
+ * @tsk: member task of the threadgroup to lock
+ *
+ * Lock the threadgroup @tsk belongs to. No new task is allowed to enter
+ * and member tasks aren't allowed to exit (as indicated by PF_EXITING) or
+ * perform exec. This is useful for cases where the threadgroup needs to
+ * stay stable across blockable operations.
+ */
static inline void threadgroup_lock(struct task_struct *tsk)
{
+ /* exec uses exit for de-threading, grab cred_guard_mutex first */
+ mutex_lock(&tsk->signal->cred_guard_mutex);
down_write(&tsk->signal->group_rwsem);
}
+
+/**
+ * threadgroup_unlock - unlock threadgroup
+ * @tsk: member task of the threadgroup to unlock
+ *
+ * Reverse threadgroup_lock().
+ */
static inline void threadgroup_unlock(struct task_struct *tsk)
{
up_write(&tsk->signal->group_rwsem);
+ mutex_unlock(&tsk->signal->cred_guard_mutex);
}
#else
static inline void threadgroup_change_begin(struct task_struct *tsk) {}
diff --git a/kernel/exit.c b/kernel/exit.c
index 7b6c4fa..a5b40b3 100644
--- a/kernel/exit.c
+++ b/kernel/exit.c
@@ -936,6 +936,12 @@ NORET_TYPE void do_exit(long code)
schedule();
}
+ /*
+ * @tsk's threadgroup is going through changes - lock out users
+ * which expect stable threadgroup.
+ */
+ threadgroup_change_begin(tsk);
+
exit_irq_thread();
exit_signals(tsk); /* sets PF_EXITING */
@@ -1018,10 +1024,6 @@ NORET_TYPE void do_exit(long code)
kfree(current->pi_state_cache);
#endif
/*
- * Make sure we are holding no locks:
- */
- debug_check_no_locks_held(tsk);
- /*
* We can do this unlocked here. The futex code uses this flag
* just to verify whether the pi state cleanup has been done
* or not. In the worst case it loops once more.
@@ -1039,6 +1041,12 @@ NORET_TYPE void do_exit(long code)
preempt_disable();
exit_rcu();
+ /*
+ * Release threadgroup and make sure we are holding no locks.
+ */
+ threadgroup_change_done(tsk);
+ debug_check_no_locks_held(tsk);
+
/* this task is now dead and freezer should ignore it */
current->flags |= PF_NOFREEZE;
--
1.7.6
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-04 18:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-04 18:01 [PATCHSET cgroup] extend threadgroup locking Tejun Heo
2011-09-04 18:01 ` [PATCH 1/4] cgroup: change locking order in attach_task_by_pid() Tejun Heo
2011-09-18 18:56 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-10-10 17:34 ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-10 17:43 ` Tejun Heo
2011-09-04 18:01 ` [PATCH 2/4] threadgroup: rename signal->threadgroup_fork_lock to ->group_rwsem Tejun Heo
2011-09-04 18:01 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2011-09-12 4:04 ` [PATCH 3/4] threadgroup: extend threadgroup_lock() to cover exit and exec Paul Menage
2011-09-13 7:54 ` Tejun Heo
2011-09-18 17:37 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-09-18 18:46 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-10-08 18:37 ` Ben Blum
2011-10-10 17:11 ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-12 17:51 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-10-12 18:05 ` Ben Blum
2011-10-12 18:29 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-10-12 18:44 ` Ben Blum
2011-10-12 19:07 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-09-04 18:01 ` [PATCH 4/4] cgroup: always lock threadgroup during migration Tejun Heo
2011-09-18 17:41 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-10-10 17:31 ` Tejun Heo
2011-09-05 4:05 ` [PATCHSET cgroup] extend threadgroup locking Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-09-05 8:43 ` Tejun Heo
2011-09-06 9:00 ` Li Zefan
2011-09-11 3:35 ` Tejun Heo
2011-09-14 18:33 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-09-14 23:33 ` Tejun Heo
2011-09-12 4:11 ` Paul Menage
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1315159280-25032-4-git-send-email-htejun@gmail.com \
--to=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=matthltc@us.ibm.com \
--cc=menage@google.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=paul@paulmenage.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome