From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750911Ab1IIECr (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Sep 2011 00:02:47 -0400 Received: from perches-mx.perches.com ([206.117.179.246]:45242 "EHLO labridge.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750705Ab1IIECo (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Sep 2011 00:02:44 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] dynamic_debug: consolidate repetitive struct _ddebug descriptor definitions From: Joe Perches To: Andrew Morton Cc: Jason Baron , gregkh@suse.de, jim.cromie@gmail.com, bvanassche@acm.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2011 21:02:43 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20110908204200.6cf7abc2.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <94c0e3275b0bf7d2cad8e7909da1482a867e7bc6.1314725877.git.jbaron@redhat.com> <20110908165230.a7505321.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <1315534396.11939.10.camel@Joe-Laptop> <20110908204200.6cf7abc2.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.1.91- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <1315540963.11939.12.camel@Joe-Laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2011-09-08 at 20:42 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 19:13:16 -0700 Joe Perches wrote: > > On Thu, 2011-09-08 at 16:52 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 14:28:41 -0400 > > > Jason Baron wrote: > > > > Replace the repetitive struct _ddebug descriptor definitions with > > > > a new DECLARE_DYNAMIC_DEBUG_META_DATA(name, fmt) macro. > > > > +#define DECLARE_DYNAMIC_DEBUG_METADATA(name, fmt) \ > > > > + static struct _ddebug __used __aligned(8) \ > > > > + __attribute__((section("__verbose"))) name = { \ > > > > + .modname = KBUILD_MODNAME, \ > > > > + .function = __func__, \ > > > > + .filename = __FILE__, \ > > > > + .format = (fmt), \ > > > > + .lineno = __LINE__, \ > > > > + .flags = _DPRINTK_FLAGS_DEFAULT, \ > > > > + .enabled = false, \ > > > > + } > > > That macro implements a definition, not a declaration > > Andrew, that's not quite true > It's precisely true. Not according to the c99 standard section 6.7 cheers, Joe