mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To: Jim Cromie <jim.cromie@gmail.com>
Cc: Jason Baron <jbaron@redhat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	gregkh@suse.de, Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] dynamic_debug: consolidate repetitive struct _ddebug descriptor definitions
Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2011 14:04:11 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1315602252.23777.5.camel@Joe-Laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJfuBxx=r_P7em_naUN_c96A++V4v6nfd8B_V2dppRag-z_qwg@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 13:23 -0600, Jim Cromie wrote:
> It also allows for "lite" usage of dynamic-debug,
> including 1..few descriptor per file or module to control all debug printing.
> As outlined, this "lite" usage is determined by the coder,
> it would be cool if it were more configurable than that,
> but I dont see how that would work atm.

General problem is that there are subsystems that use
bitmasks with more than a just a few bits defined.

> Now that the worms have escaped the can, one other thought:
> 	unsigned int lineno:24;
> allows for insanely large files.  The largest in the tree is 29k,
> 16 bits would cover all files likely to be accepted in the future.

I hope ever.

> Since since it works with module/file/function filtering, 3-4 user
> flags should be plenty.

I rather doubt it as there are both level and mask uses.

There is no real issue with adding another flag value
to the struct anyway.  It's declared __aligned(8) and
it ends in an unaligned single char so there's space
for another u32 without extending the structure size.




  reply	other threads:[~2011-09-09 21:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-08-30 18:28 [PATCH 0/4] dynamic debug: cleanups + compile fix v2 Jason Baron
2011-08-30 18:28 ` [PATCH 1/4] dynamic_debug: consolidate repetitive struct _ddebug descriptor definitions Jason Baron
2011-09-08 23:52   ` Andrew Morton
2011-09-09  2:13     ` Joe Perches
2011-09-09  3:42       ` Andrew Morton
2011-09-09  4:02         ` Joe Perches
2011-09-09  4:20           ` Andrew Morton
2011-09-09  4:35             ` Joe Perches
2011-09-09 10:31           ` Bart Van Assche
2011-09-09 19:23             ` Jim Cromie
2011-09-09 21:04               ` Joe Perches [this message]
2011-09-09 22:06                 ` Jim Cromie
2011-09-09 22:32                   ` Joe Perches
2011-09-12 14:47                     ` Jason Baron
2011-09-12 18:15                       ` Jim Cromie
2011-09-12 15:00               ` Jason Baron
2011-08-30 18:28 ` [PATCH 2/4] dynamic_debug: remove num_enabled accounting Jason Baron
2011-08-30 18:28 ` [PATCH 3/4] dynamic_debug: use a single printk() to emit msgs Jason Baron
2011-09-08 23:52   ` Andrew Morton
2011-08-30 18:28 ` [PATCH 4/4] dynamic_debug: fix undefined reference to `__netdev_printk' Jason Baron
2011-09-01 16:16   ` Arnd Bergmann
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-08-25 17:34 [PATCH 0/4] dynamic debug: cleanups + compile fix Jason Baron
2011-08-25 17:34 ` [PATCH 1/4] dynamic_debug: consolidate repetitive struct _ddebug descriptor definitions Jason Baron
2011-08-26 10:46   ` Bart Van Assche

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1315602252.23777.5.camel@Joe-Laptop \
    --to=joe@perches.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=gregkh@suse.de \
    --cc=jbaron@redhat.com \
    --cc=jim.cromie@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®