From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751588Ab1IZHVy (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Sep 2011 03:21:54 -0400 Received: from casper.infradead.org ([85.118.1.10]:33785 "EHLO casper.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751280Ab1IZHVx convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Sep 2011 03:21:53 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Reduce cross CPU IPI interference From: Peter Zijlstra To: Gilad Ben-Yossef Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Frederic Weisbecker , Russell King , Chris Metcalf , linux-mm@kvack.org, Christoph Lameter , Pekka Enberg , Matt Mackall Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 09:20:59 +0200 In-Reply-To: <1316940890-24138-1-git-send-email-gilad@benyossef.com> References: <1316940890-24138-1-git-send-email-gilad@benyossef.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-Mailer: Evolution 3.0.3- Message-ID: <1317021659.9084.51.camel@twins> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 2011-09-25 at 11:54 +0300, Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote: > This first version creates an on_each_cpu_mask infrastructure API But we already have the existing smp_call_function_many() doing that. The on_each_cpu() thing is mostly a hysterical relic and could be completely depricated