From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754180Ab1I1OXW (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Sep 2011 10:23:22 -0400 Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([71.74.56.123]:56080 "EHLO hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752322Ab1I1OXV (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Sep 2011 10:23:21 -0400 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=lfM0d0QHaVz67dfwwr9cyIw6NbaGR/pZhMD6XWNi0kk= c=1 sm=0 a=v1jNb7L17ooA:10 a=5SG0PmZfjMsA:10 a=Q9fys5e9bTEA:10 a=17wjrS5wAhQaEczCPkpxpQ==:17 a=R6Ph2Kqlq8VnvbJxTCsA:9 a=PUjeQqilurYA:10 a=17wjrS5wAhQaEczCPkpxpQ==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Originating-IP: 74.67.83.30 Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 1/2] perf tools: Collect tracing event data files directly From: Steven Rostedt To: Frederic Weisbecker Cc: Jiri Olsa , acme@redhat.com, eric.dumazet@gmail.com, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, mingo@elte.hu, paulus@samba.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, nhorman@tuxdriver.com Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 10:23:20 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20110928141754.GT18553@somewhere> References: <20110925133406.GB2702@jolsa.brq.redhat.com> <1317028312-5156-1-git-send-email-jolsa@redhat.com> <1317028312-5156-2-git-send-email-jolsa@redhat.com> <1317044192.26514.1.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> <20110926145606.GA8886@jolsa.brq.redhat.com> <20110928135525.GS18553@somewhere> <1317218589.4588.4.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> <20110928141754.GT18553@somewhere> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.0.3- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <1317219800.4588.6.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2011-09-28 at 16:17 +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > > > > > > But it seems Steve's patches are not completely uncontroversial because > > > of some crazy disagreements on where the libparsevent.so should lay (tools generic > > > or tied to perf). > > > > Which to me seems to be a silly road block, in which I never got a clear > > answer for. > > Yeah we need to sort that out with Ingo. And include Arnaldo, as he was the one that suggested to do what I did that Ingo NACKd. And I consider Arnaldo the maintainer of the userspace side of perf, so I will not step on his toes in what I do. -- Steve