From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754550Ab1I1RdZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Sep 2011 13:33:25 -0400 Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.23]:60363 "HELO mailout-de.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751433Ab1I1RdY (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Sep 2011 13:33:24 -0400 X-Authenticated: #14349625 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+j3Ah/CtGjQEHBKRgsCrwBouPqdbYxHQHjVypgMT TVs8aWaRcU4T2e Subject: Re: x86: interrupt routing question From: Mike Galbraith To: Bjorn Helgaas Cc: LKML , Thomas Gleixner In-Reply-To: References: <1310455620.4844.29.camel@marge.simson.net> <1317194932.6506.94.camel@marge.simson.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 19:33:01 +0200 Message-ID: <1317231181.10997.72.camel@marge.simson.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2011-09-28 at 09:26 -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 1:28 AM, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > > > For the next sod who gets curious about irq routing behavior difference, > > and tries to ask google. > > Thanks for following up on this! > > So, having read the fine manual, do you think this is a Linux bug, or > something that could be improved in Linux, either by changing the > behavior or making the dmesg more informative? It certainly cost you > a lot of time, and it'd be nice if we could save the next person :) It didn't take long at all after I stopped trying to ask google and acpidump, and went to the source. I don't think it's a bug, but I only _started_ to RTFM, so whether it could be improved is a question I can't begin to answer.. and kinda hope to never be able to answer :) -Mike