From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Cc: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Venki Pallipadi <venki@google.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
stable@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 1/2] sched: use resched IPI to kick off the nohz idle balance
Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2011 21:36:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1317670590.20367.38.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110929223242.837017656@sbsiddha-desk.sc.intel.com>
On Thu, 2011-09-29 at 15:30 -0700, Suresh Siddha wrote:
> ---
> kernel/sched.c | 14 +++++++++++---
> kernel/sched_fair.c | 27 +++++++--------------------
> 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux-2.6-tip/kernel/sched.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6-tip.orig/kernel/sched.c
> +++ linux-2.6-tip/kernel/sched.c
> @@ -2733,7 +2733,7 @@ void scheduler_ipi(void)
> struct rq *rq = this_rq();
> struct task_struct *list = xchg(&rq->wake_list, NULL);
>
> - if (!list)
> + if (!list && !idle_cpu(cpu_of(rq)))
> return;
Why not make that !rq->nohz_balance_kick? (wrapped in a helper for !
CONFIG_NO_HZ)
> /*
> @@ -2750,7 +2750,16 @@ void scheduler_ipi(void)
> * somewhat pessimize the simple resched case.
> */
> irq_enter();
> - sched_ttwu_do_pending(list);
> +
> + if (list)
> + sched_ttwu_do_pending(list);
> +
> + /*
> + * Check if someone kicked us for doing the nohz idle load balance.
> + */
> + if (unlikely((rq->idle == current) && rq->nohz_balance_kick &&
> + !need_resched()))
> + raise_softirq_irqoff(SCHED_SOFTIRQ);
And make that: idle_cpu() && rq->nohz_balance_kick && !need_resched()
All wrapped in #ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ goo?
> tself as idle load_balancer, while
> @@ -4450,11 +4434,14 @@ static void nohz_balancer_kick(int cpu)
> }
>
> if (!cpu_rq(ilb_cpu)->nohz_balance_kick) {
> - struct call_single_data *cp;
> -
> cpu_rq(ilb_cpu)->nohz_balance_kick = 1;
> - cp = &per_cpu(remote_sched_softirq_cb, cpu);
> - __smp_call_function_single(ilb_cpu, cp, 0);
> + /*
> + * Use kick_process instead of resched_cpu.
> + * This way we generate a sched IPI on the target cpu which
> + * is idle. And the softirq performing nohz idle load balance
> + * will be run before returning from the IPI.
> + */
Shouldn't we have a memory barrier of sorts before sending the IPI?
> + kick_process(idle_task(ilb_cpu));
> }
> return;
> }
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-03 19:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-29 22:30 Suresh Siddha
2011-09-29 22:30 ` [patch 2/2] sched: request for idle balance during nohz idle load balance Suresh Siddha
2011-10-03 19:36 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2011-10-03 21:13 ` [patch 1/2] sched: use resched IPI to kick off the nohz idle balance Suresh Siddha
2011-10-03 19:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1317670590.20367.38.camel@twins \
--to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=prarit@redhat.com \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
--cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
--cc=vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=venki@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®