From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S935882Ab1JFUpt (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Oct 2011 16:45:49 -0400 Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([71.74.56.122]:64928 "EHLO hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756962Ab1JFUps (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Oct 2011 16:45:48 -0400 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=XWD5/VRj2HUJOhsR8cgmvPBlhMACpZXxseY1Kn/ehQI= c=1 sm=0 a=msyzJTVhAHgA:10 a=5SG0PmZfjMsA:10 a=Q9fys5e9bTEA:10 a=17wjrS5wAhQaEczCPkpxpQ==:17 a=Hsptb0i6piVC7Twp2wYA:9 a=PUjeQqilurYA:10 a=17wjrS5wAhQaEczCPkpxpQ==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Originating-IP: 74.67.83.30 Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC V2 3/5] jump_label: if a key has already been initialized, don't nop it out From: Steven Rostedt To: Jason Baron Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" , Jeremy Fitzhardinge , "David S. Miller" , David Daney , Michael Ellerman , Jan Glauber , the arch/x86 maintainers , Xen Devel , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Jeremy Fitzhardinge , peterz@infradead.org, rth@redhat.com Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2011 16:45:45 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20111006203358.GA5985@redhat.com> References: <20111004141011.GA2520@redhat.com> <4E8B3489.60902@zytor.com> <4E8CF348.4080405@goop.org> <4E8CF385.2080804@zytor.com> <4E8DEB19.1050509@goop.org> <20111006181055.GA2505@redhat.com> <1317925615.4729.14.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> <4E8DF385.3070009@zytor.com> <20111006183841.GC2505@redhat.com> <1317929656.4729.22.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> <20111006203358.GA5985@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.0.3- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <1317933947.4729.25.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2011-10-06 at 16:33 -0400, Jason Baron wrote: > > Then have the record_jumplabel.c (or whatever it's called) find all the > > jmps at run time, and convert them into the appropriate nop. > > > > I'd prefer to do this at build-time as hpa said. We don't want there to > be some race b/w patching in the no-ops and taking an incorrect branch. Yep, this record_jumplabel.c would execute at build time. Just like the record_mcount.c does. > > > Then at runtime patching, the jumplabel code could figure out what size > > jump it needs to replace it. The runtime patching is when we can figure out what size the compiler used. That wont change. It should be pretty trivial to do. I can't see any races here. -- Steve