mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 04/11] rcu: Remove one layer of abstraction from PROVE_RCU checking
Date: Fri,  7 Oct 2011 18:22:03 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1318004530-705-5-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1318004530-705-1-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com>

From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Simplify things a bit by substituting the definitions of the single-line
rcu_read_acquire(), rcu_read_release(), rcu_read_acquire_bh(),
rcu_read_release_bh(), rcu_read_acquire_sched(), and
rcu_read_release_sched() functions at their call points.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 include/linux/rcupdate.h |   53 +++++++---------------------------------------
 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate.h b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
index fe4f8976..e550f2a 100644
--- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h
+++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
@@ -240,41 +240,8 @@ static inline void rcu_lock_release(struct lockdep_map *map)
 }
 
 extern struct lockdep_map rcu_lock_map;
-
-static inline void rcu_read_acquire(void)
-{
-	rcu_lock_acquire(&rcu_lock_map);
-}
-
-static inline void rcu_read_release(void)
-{
-	rcu_lock_release(&rcu_lock_map);
-}
-
 extern struct lockdep_map rcu_bh_lock_map;
-
-static inline void rcu_read_acquire_bh(void)
-{
-	rcu_lock_acquire(&rcu_bh_lock_map);
-}
-
-static inline void rcu_read_release_bh(void)
-{
-	rcu_lock_release(&rcu_bh_lock_map);
-}
-
 extern struct lockdep_map rcu_sched_lock_map;
-
-static inline void rcu_read_acquire_sched(void)
-{
-	rcu_lock_acquire(&rcu_sched_lock_map);
-}
-
-static inline void rcu_read_release_sched(void)
-{
-	rcu_lock_release(&rcu_sched_lock_map);
-}
-
 extern int debug_lockdep_rcu_enabled(void);
 
 /**
@@ -357,12 +324,8 @@ static inline int rcu_read_lock_sched_held(void)
 
 #else /* #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC */
 
-# define rcu_read_acquire()		do { } while (0)
-# define rcu_read_release()		do { } while (0)
-# define rcu_read_acquire_bh()		do { } while (0)
-# define rcu_read_release_bh()		do { } while (0)
-# define rcu_read_acquire_sched()	do { } while (0)
-# define rcu_read_release_sched()	do { } while (0)
+# define rcu_lock_acquire(a)		do { } while (0)
+# define rcu_lock_release(a)		do { } while (0)
 
 static inline int rcu_read_lock_held(void)
 {
@@ -683,7 +646,7 @@ static inline void rcu_read_lock(void)
 {
 	__rcu_read_lock();
 	__acquire(RCU);
-	rcu_read_acquire();
+	rcu_lock_acquire(&rcu_lock_map);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -703,7 +666,7 @@ static inline void rcu_read_lock(void)
  */
 static inline void rcu_read_unlock(void)
 {
-	rcu_read_release();
+	rcu_lock_release(&rcu_lock_map);
 	__release(RCU);
 	__rcu_read_unlock();
 }
@@ -724,7 +687,7 @@ static inline void rcu_read_lock_bh(void)
 {
 	local_bh_disable();
 	__acquire(RCU_BH);
-	rcu_read_acquire_bh();
+	rcu_lock_acquire(&rcu_bh_lock_map);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -734,7 +697,7 @@ static inline void rcu_read_lock_bh(void)
  */
 static inline void rcu_read_unlock_bh(void)
 {
-	rcu_read_release_bh();
+	rcu_lock_release(&rcu_bh_lock_map);
 	__release(RCU_BH);
 	local_bh_enable();
 }
@@ -751,7 +714,7 @@ static inline void rcu_read_lock_sched(void)
 {
 	preempt_disable();
 	__acquire(RCU_SCHED);
-	rcu_read_acquire_sched();
+	rcu_lock_acquire(&rcu_sched_lock_map);
 }
 
 /* Used by lockdep and tracing: cannot be traced, cannot call lockdep. */
@@ -768,7 +731,7 @@ static inline notrace void rcu_read_lock_sched_notrace(void)
  */
 static inline void rcu_read_unlock_sched(void)
 {
-	rcu_read_release_sched();
+	rcu_lock_release(&rcu_sched_lock_map);
 	__release(RCU_SCHED);
 	preempt_enable();
 }
-- 
1.7.5.4


  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-10-07 16:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-10-07 16:21 [PATCH 00/11] rcu: Detect illegal uses of RCU in idle and fix some v5 Frederic Weisbecker
2011-10-07 16:22 ` [PATCH 01/11] rcu: Detect illegal rcu dereference in extended quiescent state Frederic Weisbecker
2011-10-07 16:22 ` [PATCH 02/11] rcu: Inform the user about extended quiescent state on PROVE_RCU warning Frederic Weisbecker
2011-10-07 22:47   ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-10-07 16:22 ` [PATCH 03/11] rcu: Warn when rcu_read_lock() is used in extended quiescent state Frederic Weisbecker
2011-10-07 16:22 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2011-10-07 16:22 ` [PATCH 05/11] rcu: Warn when srcu_read_lock() is used in an " Frederic Weisbecker
2011-10-07 16:22 ` [PATCH 06/11] rcu: Make srcu_read_lock_held() call common lockdep-enabled function Frederic Weisbecker
2011-10-07 16:22 ` [PATCH 07/11] nohz: Separate out irq exit and idle loop dyntick logic Frederic Weisbecker
2011-10-07 16:22 ` [PATCH 08/11] nohz: Allow rcu extended quiescent state handling seperately from tick stop Frederic Weisbecker
2011-10-08 13:43   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-10-08 14:01   ` [PATCH 08/11 v2] " Frederic Weisbecker
2011-10-13  6:57     ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-10-13  7:03       ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-10-13 12:50         ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-10-13 22:51           ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-10-14 12:08             ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-10-14 17:00               ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-10-16 13:28                 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-10-17  2:26                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-10-07 16:22 ` [PATCH 09/11] x86: Enter rcu extended qs after idle notifier call Frederic Weisbecker
2011-10-07 16:22 ` [PATCH 10/11] x86: Call idle notifier after irq_enter() Frederic Weisbecker
2011-10-07 16:22 ` [PATCH 11/11] rcu: Fix early call to rcu_idle_enter() Frederic Weisbecker
2011-10-07 23:32 ` [PATCH 00/11] rcu: Detect illegal uses of RCU in idle and fix some v5 Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1318004530-705-5-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --to=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome