From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751744Ab1JIDFs (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Oct 2011 23:05:48 -0400 Received: from edison.jonmasters.org ([173.255.233.168]:53180 "EHLO edison.jonmasters.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751413Ab1JIDFr (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Oct 2011 23:05:47 -0400 From: Jon Masters To: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, Krzysztof Halasa , Adrian Bunk , "Frank Ch. Eigler" , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Greg KH In-Reply-To: <4E90BC10.5020300@zytor.com> References: <4E8655CD.90107@zytor.com> <201110020304.28288.rjw@sisk.pl> <4E87B885.50005@zytor.com> <201110021354.57995.rjw@sisk.pl> <4E88A537.4010008@zytor.com> <20111003093239.GB25136@localhost.pp.htv.fi> <20111003180441.GD3072@localhost.pp.htv.fi> <34045.1317760188@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> <1317916702.19519.1.camel@constitution.bos.jonmasters.org> <14191.1317930659@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> <15324.1318004954@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> <1318050133.19519.184.camel@constitution.bos.jonmasters.org> <58779.1318084612@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> <1318096788.19519.187.camel@constitution.bos.jonmasters.org> <4E90BC10.5020300@zytor.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Organization: World Organi[sz]ation Of Broken Dreams Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2011 23:01:43 -0400 Message-ID: <1318129303.19519.192.camel@constitution.bos.jonmasters.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 (2.30.3-1.fc13) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 74.92.29.237 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: jonathan@jonmasters.org Subject: Re: kernel.org status: establishing a PGP web of trust X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Sun, 08 Nov 2009 07:31:22 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on edison.jonmasters.org) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 2011-10-08 at 14:09 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > On 10/08/2011 10:59 AM, Jon Masters wrote: > > Good point about being pedantic, and the rest of your comments :) I > > understand that I'm taking this a little far but I'm just trying to > > point out one particular gaping hole in the way these things are > > currently done. One reason I stopped doing keysigning parties is that I > > realized they were mostly a show. You turn up and get a key signed and > > then everyone is impressed that you're in the strong set...wupdedoo. Not > > that I've anything against signing stuff on kernel.org and trying to > > improve things (I've long directly signed everything on master with my > > own keys in slight violation of policy, but that turned out to right). > > > > Not so much in violation of policy... we just couldn't get people to do it. Right, no offense to you intended, and I know you tried :) I suspect that won't be a huge problem now...or I hope so. Jon.