From: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jaxboe@fusionio.com
Cc: tj@kernel.org, christophe@saout.de, dm-devel@redhat.com,
msnitzer@redhat.com, Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] blk-flush: move the queue kick into blk_insert_cloned_request
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 17:22:41 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1318454562-25291-2-git-send-email-jmoyer@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1318454562-25291-1-git-send-email-jmoyer@redhat.com>
A dm-multipath user reported[1] a problem when trying to boot
a kernel with commit 4853abaae7e4a2af938115ce9071ef8684fb7af4
(block: fix flush machinery for stacking drivers with differring
flush flags) applied. It turns out that an empty flush request
can be sent into blk_insert_flush. When the BUG_ON was fixed
to allow for this, I/O on the underlying device would stall. The
reason is that blk_insert_cloned_request does not kick the queue.
In the aforementioned commit, I had added a special case to
kick the queue if data was sent down but the queue flags did
not require a flush. A better solution is to push the queue
kick up into blk_insert_cloned_request.
This patch, along with a follow-on which fixes the BUG_ON, fixes
the issue reported.
[1] http://www.redhat.com/archives/dm-devel/2011-September/msg00154.html
Reported-by: Christophe Saout <christophe@saout.de>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
---
block/blk-core.c | 2 ++
block/blk-flush.c | 1 -
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
index d34433a..795154e 100644
--- a/block/blk-core.c
+++ b/block/blk-core.c
@@ -1725,6 +1725,8 @@ int blk_insert_cloned_request(struct request_queue *q, struct request *rq)
where = ELEVATOR_INSERT_FLUSH;
add_acct_request(q, rq, where);
+ if (where == ELEVATOR_INSERT_FLUSH)
+ __blk_run_queue(q);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(q->queue_lock, flags);
return 0;
diff --git a/block/blk-flush.c b/block/blk-flush.c
index 491eb30..0ff29c6 100644
--- a/block/blk-flush.c
+++ b/block/blk-flush.c
@@ -330,7 +330,6 @@ void blk_insert_flush(struct request *rq)
if ((policy & REQ_FSEQ_DATA) &&
!(policy & (REQ_FSEQ_PREFLUSH | REQ_FSEQ_POSTFLUSH))) {
list_add_tail(&rq->queuelist, &q->queue_head);
- blk_run_queue_async(q);
return;
}
--
1.7.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-12 21:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-12 21:22 [PATCH 0/2] block: fix flush regression introduced in 3.1-rc3 Jeff Moyer
2011-10-12 21:22 ` Jeff Moyer [this message]
2011-10-12 22:17 ` [PATCH 1/2] blk-flush: move the queue kick into blk_insert_cloned_request Tejun Heo
2011-10-14 15:05 ` [dm-devel] " Vivek Goyal
2011-10-12 21:22 ` [PATCH 2/2] blk-flush: fix invalid BUG_ON in blk_insert_flush Jeff Moyer
2011-10-12 22:18 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1318454562-25291-2-git-send-email-jmoyer@redhat.com \
--to=jmoyer@redhat.com \
--cc=christophe@saout.de \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=jaxboe@fusionio.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=msnitzer@redhat.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®