mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@elte.hu, acme@redhat.com,
	ming.m.lin@intel.com, andi@firstfloor.org,
	robert.richter@amd.com, ravitillo@lbl.gov, will.deacon@arm.com,
	paulus@samba.org, benh@kernel.crashing.org, rth@twiddle.net,
	ralf@linux-mips.org, davem@davemloft.net, lethal@linux-sh.org
Subject: [PATCH 06/12] perf_events: implement PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH for Intel X86 (v2)
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 14:37:07 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1318595833-29984-7-git-send-email-eranian@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1318595833-29984-1-git-send-email-eranian@google.com>

This patch implements PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH support for Intel
X86 processors. It connects PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH to the actual LBR.

The patch adds the hooks in the PMU irq handler to save the LBR
on counter overflow for both regular and PEBS modes.

Signed-off-by: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c     |   35 +++++++++++++
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_ds.c  |   10 ++--
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_lbr.c |   73 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 include/linux/perf_event.h                 |    3 +
 4 files changed, 113 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
index 6f313c0..901217d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
@@ -730,6 +730,19 @@ static __initconst const u64 atom_hw_cache_event_ids
  },
 };
 
+static inline bool intel_pmu_needs_lbr_smpl(struct perf_event *event)
+{
+	/* user explicitly requested branch sampling */
+	if (has_branch_stack(event))
+		return true;
+
+	/* implicit branch sampling to correct PEBS skid */
+	if (x86_pmu.intel_cap.pebs_trap && event->attr.precise_ip > 1)
+		return true;
+
+	return false;
+}
+
 static void intel_pmu_disable_all(void)
 {
 	struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = &__get_cpu_var(cpu_hw_events);
@@ -884,6 +897,13 @@ static void intel_pmu_disable_event(struct perf_event *event)
 	cpuc->intel_ctrl_guest_mask &= ~(1ull << hwc->idx);
 	cpuc->intel_ctrl_host_mask &= ~(1ull << hwc->idx);
 
+	/*
+	 * must disable before any actual event
+	 * because any event may be combined with LBR
+	 */
+	if (intel_pmu_needs_lbr_smpl(event))
+		intel_pmu_lbr_disable(event);
+
 	if (unlikely(hwc->config_base == MSR_ARCH_PERFMON_FIXED_CTR_CTRL)) {
 		intel_pmu_disable_fixed(hwc);
 		return;
@@ -938,6 +958,12 @@ static void intel_pmu_enable_event(struct perf_event *event)
 		intel_pmu_enable_bts(hwc->config);
 		return;
 	}
+	/*
+	 * must enabled before any actual event
+	 * because any event may be combined with LBR
+	 */
+	if (intel_pmu_needs_lbr_smpl(event))
+		intel_pmu_lbr_enable(event);
 
 	if (event->attr.exclude_host)
 		cpuc->intel_ctrl_guest_mask |= (1ull << hwc->idx);
@@ -1060,6 +1086,9 @@ static int intel_pmu_handle_irq(struct pt_regs *regs)
 
 		data.period = event->hw.last_period;
 
+		if (has_branch_stack(event))
+			data.br_stack = &cpuc->lbr_stack;
+
 		if (perf_event_overflow(event, &data, regs))
 			x86_pmu_stop(event, 0);
 	}
@@ -1308,6 +1337,12 @@ static int intel_pmu_hw_config(struct perf_event *event)
 		event->hw.config = alt_config;
 	}
 
+	if (intel_pmu_needs_lbr_smpl(event)) {
+		ret = intel_pmu_setup_lbr_filter(event);
+		if (ret)
+			return ret;
+	}
+
 	if (event->attr.type != PERF_TYPE_RAW)
 		return 0;
 
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_ds.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_ds.c
index c0d238f..d0197ba 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_ds.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_ds.c
@@ -440,9 +440,6 @@ void intel_pmu_pebs_enable(struct perf_event *event)
 
 	cpuc->pebs_enabled |= 1ULL << hwc->idx;
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(cpuc->enabled);
-
-	if (x86_pmu.intel_cap.pebs_trap && event->attr.precise_ip > 1)
-		intel_pmu_lbr_enable(event);
 }
 
 void intel_pmu_pebs_disable(struct perf_event *event)
@@ -455,9 +452,6 @@ void intel_pmu_pebs_disable(struct perf_event *event)
 		wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_PEBS_ENABLE, cpuc->pebs_enabled);
 
 	hwc->config |= ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_INT;
-
-	if (x86_pmu.intel_cap.pebs_trap && event->attr.precise_ip > 1)
-		intel_pmu_lbr_disable(event);
 }
 
 void intel_pmu_pebs_enable_all(void)
@@ -569,6 +563,7 @@ static void __intel_pmu_pebs_event(struct perf_event *event,
 	 * both formats and we don't use the other fields in this
 	 * routine.
 	 */
+	struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = &__get_cpu_var(cpu_hw_events);
 	struct pebs_record_core *pebs = __pebs;
 	struct perf_sample_data data;
 	struct pt_regs regs;
@@ -599,6 +594,9 @@ static void __intel_pmu_pebs_event(struct perf_event *event,
 	else
 		regs.flags &= ~PERF_EFLAGS_EXACT;
 
+	if (has_branch_stack(event))
+		data.br_stack = &cpuc->lbr_stack;
+
 	if (perf_event_overflow(event, &data, &regs))
 		x86_pmu_stop(event, 0);
 }
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_lbr.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_lbr.c
index 2e56ed3..f4d3fce 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_lbr.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_lbr.c
@@ -42,6 +42,7 @@ enum {
 #define LBR_PLM (LBR_KERNEL | LBR_USER)
 
 #define LBR_SEL_MASK	0x1ff /* valid bits in LBR_SELECT */
+#define LBR_NOT_SUPP	-1    /* LBR filter not supported */
 
 #define LBR_ANY		 \
 	(LBR_JCC	|\
@@ -54,6 +55,10 @@ enum {
 
 #define LBR_FROM_FLAG_MISPRED  (1ULL << 63)
 
+#define for_each_branch_sample_type(x) \
+	for ((x) = PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_USER; \
+	     (x) < PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_MAX; (x) <<= 1)
+
 /*
  * We only support LBR implementations that have FREEZE_LBRS_ON_PMI
  * otherwise it becomes near impossible to get a reliable stack.
@@ -62,6 +67,10 @@ enum {
 static void __intel_pmu_lbr_enable(void)
 {
 	u64 debugctl;
+	struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = &__get_cpu_var(cpu_hw_events);
+
+	if (cpuc->lbr_sel)
+		wrmsrl(MSR_LBR_SELECT, cpuc->lbr_sel->config);
 
 	rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_DEBUGCTLMSR, debugctl);
 	debugctl |= (DEBUGCTLMSR_LBR | DEBUGCTLMSR_FREEZE_LBRS_ON_PMI);
@@ -119,7 +128,6 @@ void intel_pmu_lbr_enable(struct perf_event *event)
 	 * Reset the LBR stack if we changed task context to
 	 * avoid data leaks.
 	 */
-
 	if (event->ctx->task && cpuc->lbr_context != event->ctx) {
 		intel_pmu_lbr_reset();
 		cpuc->lbr_context = event->ctx;
@@ -138,8 +146,11 @@ void intel_pmu_lbr_disable(struct perf_event *event)
 	cpuc->lbr_users--;
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(cpuc->lbr_users < 0);
 
-	if (cpuc->enabled && !cpuc->lbr_users)
+	if (cpuc->enabled && !cpuc->lbr_users) {
 		__intel_pmu_lbr_disable();
+		/* avoid stale pointer */
+		cpuc->lbr_context = NULL;
+	}
 }
 
 void intel_pmu_lbr_enable_all(void)
@@ -158,6 +169,9 @@ void intel_pmu_lbr_disable_all(void)
 		__intel_pmu_lbr_disable();
 }
 
+/*
+ * TOS = most recently recorded branch
+ */
 static inline u64 intel_pmu_lbr_tos(void)
 {
 	u64 tos;
@@ -242,6 +256,61 @@ void intel_pmu_lbr_read(void)
 }
 
 /*
+ * setup the HW LBR filter
+ * Used only when available, may not be enough to disambiguate
+ * all branches, may need the help of the SW filter
+ */
+static int intel_pmu_setup_hw_lbr_filter(struct perf_event *event)
+{
+	struct hw_perf_event_extra *reg;
+	u64 br_type = event->attr.branch_sample_type;
+	u64 mask = 0, m;
+	u64 v;
+
+	for_each_branch_sample_type(m) {
+		if (!(br_type & m))
+			continue;
+
+		v = x86_pmu.lbr_sel_map[m];
+		if (v == LBR_NOT_SUPP)
+			return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+		mask |= v;
+
+		if (m == PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_ANY)
+			break;
+	}
+	reg = &event->hw.branch_reg;
+	reg->idx = EXTRA_REG_LBR;
+
+	/* LBR_SELECT operates in suppress mode so invert mask */
+	reg->config = ~mask & x86_pmu.lbr_sel_mask;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int intel_pmu_setup_lbr_filter(struct perf_event *event)
+{
+	u64 br_type = event->attr.branch_sample_type;
+
+	/*
+	 * no LBR on this PMU
+	 */
+	if (!x86_pmu.lbr_nr)
+		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
+	/*
+	 * if no LBR HW filter, users can only
+	 * capture all branches
+	 */
+	if (!x86_pmu.lbr_sel_map) {
+		if (br_type != PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_ALL)
+			return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+		return 0;
+	}
+	return intel_pmu_setup_hw_lbr_filter(event);
+}
+
+/*
  * Map interface branch filters onto LBR filters
  */
 static const int nhm_lbr_sel_map[PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_MAX]=
diff --git a/include/linux/perf_event.h b/include/linux/perf_event.h
index d8f0278..c4fbe84 100644
--- a/include/linux/perf_event.h
+++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h
@@ -159,6 +159,9 @@ enum perf_branch_sample_type {
 	(PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_USER|\
 	 PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_KERNEL)
 
+#define PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_ALL \
+	(PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_PLM_ALL|PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_ANY)
+
 /*
  * The format of the data returned by read() on a perf event fd,
  * as specified by attr.read_format:
-- 
1.7.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-10-14 12:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-10-14 12:37 [PATCH 00/12] perf_events: add support for sampling taken branches (v2) Stephane Eranian
2011-10-14 12:37 ` [PATCH 01/12] perf_events: add generic taken branch sampling support (v2) Stephane Eranian
2011-12-05 21:06   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-12-06 19:42     ` Stephane Eranian
2011-12-05 22:14   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-12-06 19:27     ` Stephane Eranian
2011-10-14 12:37 ` [PATCH 02/12] perf_events: add Intel LBR MSR definitions (v2) Stephane Eranian
2011-10-14 12:37 ` [PATCH 03/12] perf_events: add Intel X86 LBR sharing logic (v2) Stephane Eranian
2011-10-14 12:37 ` [PATCH 04/12] perf_events: sync branch stack sampling with X86 precise_sampling (v2) Stephane Eranian
2011-10-14 12:37 ` [PATCH 05/12] perf_events: add LBR mappings for PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH filters (v2) Stephane Eranian
2011-12-05 22:35   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-12-07  4:22     ` Stephane Eranian
2011-10-14 12:37 ` Stephane Eranian [this message]
2011-10-14 12:37 ` [PATCH 07/12] perf_events: add LBR software filter support for Intel X86 (v2) Stephane Eranian
2011-12-05 22:29   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-14 12:37 ` [PATCH 08/12] perf_events: disable PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_* when not supported (v2) Stephane Eranian
2011-10-14 12:37 ` [PATCH 09/12] perf_events: add hook to flush branch_stack on context switch (v2) Stephane Eranian
2011-12-05 21:10   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-12-05 21:37   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-12-07 18:25     ` Stephane Eranian
2011-12-08 10:49       ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-12-08 18:04         ` Stephane Eranian
2011-12-08 18:13           ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-12-08 22:06             ` Stephane Eranian
2011-12-09  9:00               ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-14 12:37 ` [PATCH 10/12] perf: add code to support PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_STACK (v2) Stephane Eranian
2011-10-14 12:37 ` [PATCH 11/12] perf: add support for sampling taken branch to perf record (v2) Stephane Eranian
2011-10-14 12:37 ` [PATCH 12/12] perf: add support for taken branch sampling to perf report (v2) Stephane Eranian
2011-12-04 20:11 ` [PATCH 00/12] perf_events: add support for sampling taken branches (v2) Stephane Eranian
2011-12-05 15:27   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-12-05 22:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-12-06  9:49   ` Will Deacon
2011-12-06 11:03     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-12-06 19:14       ` Stephane Eranian
2011-12-06 19:20         ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-12-06 19:22           ` Stephane Eranian

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1318595833-29984-7-git-send-email-eranian@google.com \
    --to=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=acme@redhat.com \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ming.m.lin@intel.com \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=ravitillo@lbl.gov \
    --cc=robert.richter@amd.com \
    --cc=rth@twiddle.net \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®