From: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@elte.hu, acme@redhat.com,
ming.m.lin@intel.com, andi@firstfloor.org,
robert.richter@amd.com, ravitillo@lbl.gov, will.deacon@arm.com,
paulus@samba.org, benh@kernel.crashing.org, rth@twiddle.net,
ralf@linux-mips.org, davem@davemloft.net, lethal@linux-sh.org
Subject: [PATCH 06/12] perf_events: implement PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH for Intel X86 (v2)
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 14:37:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1318595833-29984-7-git-send-email-eranian@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1318595833-29984-1-git-send-email-eranian@google.com>
This patch implements PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH support for Intel
X86 processors. It connects PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH to the actual LBR.
The patch adds the hooks in the PMU irq handler to save the LBR
on counter overflow for both regular and PEBS modes.
Signed-off-by: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c | 35 +++++++++++++
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_ds.c | 10 ++--
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_lbr.c | 73 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
include/linux/perf_event.h | 3 +
4 files changed, 113 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
index 6f313c0..901217d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
@@ -730,6 +730,19 @@ static __initconst const u64 atom_hw_cache_event_ids
},
};
+static inline bool intel_pmu_needs_lbr_smpl(struct perf_event *event)
+{
+ /* user explicitly requested branch sampling */
+ if (has_branch_stack(event))
+ return true;
+
+ /* implicit branch sampling to correct PEBS skid */
+ if (x86_pmu.intel_cap.pebs_trap && event->attr.precise_ip > 1)
+ return true;
+
+ return false;
+}
+
static void intel_pmu_disable_all(void)
{
struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = &__get_cpu_var(cpu_hw_events);
@@ -884,6 +897,13 @@ static void intel_pmu_disable_event(struct perf_event *event)
cpuc->intel_ctrl_guest_mask &= ~(1ull << hwc->idx);
cpuc->intel_ctrl_host_mask &= ~(1ull << hwc->idx);
+ /*
+ * must disable before any actual event
+ * because any event may be combined with LBR
+ */
+ if (intel_pmu_needs_lbr_smpl(event))
+ intel_pmu_lbr_disable(event);
+
if (unlikely(hwc->config_base == MSR_ARCH_PERFMON_FIXED_CTR_CTRL)) {
intel_pmu_disable_fixed(hwc);
return;
@@ -938,6 +958,12 @@ static void intel_pmu_enable_event(struct perf_event *event)
intel_pmu_enable_bts(hwc->config);
return;
}
+ /*
+ * must enabled before any actual event
+ * because any event may be combined with LBR
+ */
+ if (intel_pmu_needs_lbr_smpl(event))
+ intel_pmu_lbr_enable(event);
if (event->attr.exclude_host)
cpuc->intel_ctrl_guest_mask |= (1ull << hwc->idx);
@@ -1060,6 +1086,9 @@ static int intel_pmu_handle_irq(struct pt_regs *regs)
data.period = event->hw.last_period;
+ if (has_branch_stack(event))
+ data.br_stack = &cpuc->lbr_stack;
+
if (perf_event_overflow(event, &data, regs))
x86_pmu_stop(event, 0);
}
@@ -1308,6 +1337,12 @@ static int intel_pmu_hw_config(struct perf_event *event)
event->hw.config = alt_config;
}
+ if (intel_pmu_needs_lbr_smpl(event)) {
+ ret = intel_pmu_setup_lbr_filter(event);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ }
+
if (event->attr.type != PERF_TYPE_RAW)
return 0;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_ds.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_ds.c
index c0d238f..d0197ba 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_ds.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_ds.c
@@ -440,9 +440,6 @@ void intel_pmu_pebs_enable(struct perf_event *event)
cpuc->pebs_enabled |= 1ULL << hwc->idx;
WARN_ON_ONCE(cpuc->enabled);
-
- if (x86_pmu.intel_cap.pebs_trap && event->attr.precise_ip > 1)
- intel_pmu_lbr_enable(event);
}
void intel_pmu_pebs_disable(struct perf_event *event)
@@ -455,9 +452,6 @@ void intel_pmu_pebs_disable(struct perf_event *event)
wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_PEBS_ENABLE, cpuc->pebs_enabled);
hwc->config |= ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_INT;
-
- if (x86_pmu.intel_cap.pebs_trap && event->attr.precise_ip > 1)
- intel_pmu_lbr_disable(event);
}
void intel_pmu_pebs_enable_all(void)
@@ -569,6 +563,7 @@ static void __intel_pmu_pebs_event(struct perf_event *event,
* both formats and we don't use the other fields in this
* routine.
*/
+ struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = &__get_cpu_var(cpu_hw_events);
struct pebs_record_core *pebs = __pebs;
struct perf_sample_data data;
struct pt_regs regs;
@@ -599,6 +594,9 @@ static void __intel_pmu_pebs_event(struct perf_event *event,
else
regs.flags &= ~PERF_EFLAGS_EXACT;
+ if (has_branch_stack(event))
+ data.br_stack = &cpuc->lbr_stack;
+
if (perf_event_overflow(event, &data, ®s))
x86_pmu_stop(event, 0);
}
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_lbr.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_lbr.c
index 2e56ed3..f4d3fce 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_lbr.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_lbr.c
@@ -42,6 +42,7 @@ enum {
#define LBR_PLM (LBR_KERNEL | LBR_USER)
#define LBR_SEL_MASK 0x1ff /* valid bits in LBR_SELECT */
+#define LBR_NOT_SUPP -1 /* LBR filter not supported */
#define LBR_ANY \
(LBR_JCC |\
@@ -54,6 +55,10 @@ enum {
#define LBR_FROM_FLAG_MISPRED (1ULL << 63)
+#define for_each_branch_sample_type(x) \
+ for ((x) = PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_USER; \
+ (x) < PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_MAX; (x) <<= 1)
+
/*
* We only support LBR implementations that have FREEZE_LBRS_ON_PMI
* otherwise it becomes near impossible to get a reliable stack.
@@ -62,6 +67,10 @@ enum {
static void __intel_pmu_lbr_enable(void)
{
u64 debugctl;
+ struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = &__get_cpu_var(cpu_hw_events);
+
+ if (cpuc->lbr_sel)
+ wrmsrl(MSR_LBR_SELECT, cpuc->lbr_sel->config);
rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_DEBUGCTLMSR, debugctl);
debugctl |= (DEBUGCTLMSR_LBR | DEBUGCTLMSR_FREEZE_LBRS_ON_PMI);
@@ -119,7 +128,6 @@ void intel_pmu_lbr_enable(struct perf_event *event)
* Reset the LBR stack if we changed task context to
* avoid data leaks.
*/
-
if (event->ctx->task && cpuc->lbr_context != event->ctx) {
intel_pmu_lbr_reset();
cpuc->lbr_context = event->ctx;
@@ -138,8 +146,11 @@ void intel_pmu_lbr_disable(struct perf_event *event)
cpuc->lbr_users--;
WARN_ON_ONCE(cpuc->lbr_users < 0);
- if (cpuc->enabled && !cpuc->lbr_users)
+ if (cpuc->enabled && !cpuc->lbr_users) {
__intel_pmu_lbr_disable();
+ /* avoid stale pointer */
+ cpuc->lbr_context = NULL;
+ }
}
void intel_pmu_lbr_enable_all(void)
@@ -158,6 +169,9 @@ void intel_pmu_lbr_disable_all(void)
__intel_pmu_lbr_disable();
}
+/*
+ * TOS = most recently recorded branch
+ */
static inline u64 intel_pmu_lbr_tos(void)
{
u64 tos;
@@ -242,6 +256,61 @@ void intel_pmu_lbr_read(void)
}
/*
+ * setup the HW LBR filter
+ * Used only when available, may not be enough to disambiguate
+ * all branches, may need the help of the SW filter
+ */
+static int intel_pmu_setup_hw_lbr_filter(struct perf_event *event)
+{
+ struct hw_perf_event_extra *reg;
+ u64 br_type = event->attr.branch_sample_type;
+ u64 mask = 0, m;
+ u64 v;
+
+ for_each_branch_sample_type(m) {
+ if (!(br_type & m))
+ continue;
+
+ v = x86_pmu.lbr_sel_map[m];
+ if (v == LBR_NOT_SUPP)
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+ mask |= v;
+
+ if (m == PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_ANY)
+ break;
+ }
+ reg = &event->hw.branch_reg;
+ reg->idx = EXTRA_REG_LBR;
+
+ /* LBR_SELECT operates in suppress mode so invert mask */
+ reg->config = ~mask & x86_pmu.lbr_sel_mask;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int intel_pmu_setup_lbr_filter(struct perf_event *event)
+{
+ u64 br_type = event->attr.branch_sample_type;
+
+ /*
+ * no LBR on this PMU
+ */
+ if (!x86_pmu.lbr_nr)
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
+ /*
+ * if no LBR HW filter, users can only
+ * capture all branches
+ */
+ if (!x86_pmu.lbr_sel_map) {
+ if (br_type != PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_ALL)
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+ return 0;
+ }
+ return intel_pmu_setup_hw_lbr_filter(event);
+}
+
+/*
* Map interface branch filters onto LBR filters
*/
static const int nhm_lbr_sel_map[PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_MAX]=
diff --git a/include/linux/perf_event.h b/include/linux/perf_event.h
index d8f0278..c4fbe84 100644
--- a/include/linux/perf_event.h
+++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h
@@ -159,6 +159,9 @@ enum perf_branch_sample_type {
(PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_USER|\
PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_KERNEL)
+#define PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_ALL \
+ (PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_PLM_ALL|PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_ANY)
+
/*
* The format of the data returned by read() on a perf event fd,
* as specified by attr.read_format:
--
1.7.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-14 12:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-14 12:37 [PATCH 00/12] perf_events: add support for sampling taken branches (v2) Stephane Eranian
2011-10-14 12:37 ` [PATCH 01/12] perf_events: add generic taken branch sampling support (v2) Stephane Eranian
2011-12-05 21:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-12-06 19:42 ` Stephane Eranian
2011-12-05 22:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-12-06 19:27 ` Stephane Eranian
2011-10-14 12:37 ` [PATCH 02/12] perf_events: add Intel LBR MSR definitions (v2) Stephane Eranian
2011-10-14 12:37 ` [PATCH 03/12] perf_events: add Intel X86 LBR sharing logic (v2) Stephane Eranian
2011-10-14 12:37 ` [PATCH 04/12] perf_events: sync branch stack sampling with X86 precise_sampling (v2) Stephane Eranian
2011-10-14 12:37 ` [PATCH 05/12] perf_events: add LBR mappings for PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH filters (v2) Stephane Eranian
2011-12-05 22:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-12-07 4:22 ` Stephane Eranian
2011-10-14 12:37 ` Stephane Eranian [this message]
2011-10-14 12:37 ` [PATCH 07/12] perf_events: add LBR software filter support for Intel X86 (v2) Stephane Eranian
2011-12-05 22:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-14 12:37 ` [PATCH 08/12] perf_events: disable PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_* when not supported (v2) Stephane Eranian
2011-10-14 12:37 ` [PATCH 09/12] perf_events: add hook to flush branch_stack on context switch (v2) Stephane Eranian
2011-12-05 21:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-12-05 21:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-12-07 18:25 ` Stephane Eranian
2011-12-08 10:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-12-08 18:04 ` Stephane Eranian
2011-12-08 18:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-12-08 22:06 ` Stephane Eranian
2011-12-09 9:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-14 12:37 ` [PATCH 10/12] perf: add code to support PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_STACK (v2) Stephane Eranian
2011-10-14 12:37 ` [PATCH 11/12] perf: add support for sampling taken branch to perf record (v2) Stephane Eranian
2011-10-14 12:37 ` [PATCH 12/12] perf: add support for taken branch sampling to perf report (v2) Stephane Eranian
2011-12-04 20:11 ` [PATCH 00/12] perf_events: add support for sampling taken branches (v2) Stephane Eranian
2011-12-05 15:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-12-05 22:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-12-06 9:49 ` Will Deacon
2011-12-06 11:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-12-06 19:14 ` Stephane Eranian
2011-12-06 19:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-12-06 19:22 ` Stephane Eranian
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1318595833-29984-7-git-send-email-eranian@google.com \
--to=eranian@google.com \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.m.lin@intel.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
--cc=ravitillo@lbl.gov \
--cc=robert.richter@amd.com \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®