From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755231Ab1JQVET (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Oct 2011 17:04:19 -0400 Received: from opensource.wolfsonmicro.com ([80.75.67.52]:51544 "EHLO opensource.wolfsonmicro.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754142Ab1JQVES (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Oct 2011 17:04:18 -0400 From: Mark Brown To: Kukjin Kim , Grant Likely Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, patches@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com, Mark Brown Subject: [PATCH] gpio/samsung: Complain loudly if we don't know the SoC Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 22:04:15 +0100 Message-Id: <1318885455-905-1-git-send-email-broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.7.6.3 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org If we don't know the SoC type then we won't add any chips which is rather unfortunate as neither GPIO nor pinmux APIs will work, breaking lots of different subsystems. Logging at least provides a hint to the user as to what's gone wrong. Signed-off-by: Mark Brown --- drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c | 3 +++ 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c index 8baa946..90455de 100644 --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c @@ -2495,6 +2495,9 @@ static __init int samsung_gpiolib_init(void) s5p_register_gpioint_bank(IRQ_GPIO_XA, 0, IRQ_GPIO1_NR_GROUPS); s5p_register_gpioint_bank(IRQ_GPIO_XB, IRQ_GPIO1_NR_GROUPS, IRQ_GPIO2_NR_GROUPS); #endif + } else { + pr_crit("Unknown SoC in gpio-samsung, no GPIOs added\n"); + return -ENODEV; } return 0; -- 1.7.6.3