From: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>
To: Krishna Kumar2 <krkumar2@in.ibm.com>
Cc: "davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"mst@redhat.com" <mst@redhat.com>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"rusty@rustcorp.com.au" <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
"virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org"
<virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix guest memory leak and panic
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 11:50:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1318935055.3385.0.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <OFB632D60B.6534A38B-ON6525792D.003A1B21-6525792D.003B0DB8@in.ibm.com>
On Tue, 2011-10-18 at 11:46 +0100, Krishna Kumar2 wrote:
> Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com> wrote on 10/18/2011 03:17:11 PM:
>
> > > I think the best thing might be to remove the additional ref taking
> from
> > > the setter function and audit the previous changes to ensure they
> > > conform. I'll do that right away and post a fixup patch ASAP.
> >
> > Sigh, only one out of the ten callers of (__)skb_frag_set_page expects
> > skb_frag_set_page to take a new reference. I think that's pretty
> > comprehensive evidence that the current behaviour is unexpected and
> > wrong.
>
> Looks good!
Thanks.
> Does it make sense to commit both of these patches? The
> reason being - my patch becomes a cleanup of set_skb_frag()
> in virtio_net driver.
I think your patch remains a valid cleanup but I don't maintain that
code.
Ian.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-18 10:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-18 8:05 Krishna Kumar
2011-10-18 8:36 ` Ian Campbell
2011-10-18 9:47 ` Ian Campbell
2011-10-18 10:46 ` Krishna Kumar2
2011-10-18 10:50 ` Ian Campbell [this message]
2011-10-18 13:22 ` Krishna Kumar2
2011-10-19 23:38 ` David Miller
2011-10-18 13:20 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-10-19 8:55 ` Ian Campbell
2011-10-19 9:07 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-10-19 23:42 ` David Miller
2011-10-18 10:28 ` Krishna Kumar2
2011-10-18 19:12 ` David Miller
2011-10-19 6:12 ` Ian Campbell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1318935055.3385.0.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com \
--to=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=krkumar2@in.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®